Skip to content

GMOD vs MATR

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF

MATRBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.30pt a year

GMOD0.50%MATR0.80%

Avg volume · 30D

GMOD 16.4×the volume

GMOD11.8KMATR721

GMOD vs MATR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GMOD+4.1%MATR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GMOD +11.8%. MATR +4.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%7.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%, better
MATR 0.80%
Fund size
GMOD $49M
MATR $10M
1Y total return
GMOD +11.8%, better
MATR +4.1%
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
MATR 2.88%
Holdings
GMOD 20
MATR 27
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh, better
MATR 721 sh
NAV per share
GMOD $27.77
MATR $26.94
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49. MATR: Cost 69, Risk 55, Mission 80, Tradability 40, Holdings 69, Durability 35.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, MATR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODMATR
Cost30% weightA90HigherB69
Mission25% weightA74A80Higher
Risk15% weightA75HigherB55
Tradability15% weightA73HigherC40
Holdings10% weightB64B69Higher
Durability5% weightC49HigherD35

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and MATR are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and MATR 9th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 9BDDXXDefined Duration 20 ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 9BMATRHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 11BHEFTHedgeye Fourth Turning ETFScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

MATRBHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

MATR Harbor's in-house macro team reads the business cycle, then sets the mix of stock, bond, commodity and currency ETFs to match it. A tactical allocation fund for investors who want the regime call outsourced, priced near the middle of its category.

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

MATR The Fund seeks long-term total return while limiting downside risk. Its allocation is driven by regime modeling across multiple asset categories, including real estate investment trusts and commodities.

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.
  • MATR Growth, liquidity and inflation signals define the current business-cycle regime, and each regime maps to a distinct blend of equity, fixed income, commodity and currency funds.harborcapital.com
  • Run in-house by Harbor's Multi-Asset Solutions Team, with a bottom-up research layer on top of the systematic model rather than a pure black box.harborcapital.com
  • The prospectus pairs long-term total return with limiting downside risk, and reaches into corners a plain 60/40 skips: REITs, commodities, high yield, emerging markets.streetinsider.com
  • At 0.80% a year, an actively managed tactical strategy priced essentially at the allocation-category median.

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.
  • MATR Plain-vanilla allocation peers such as AOA and IRTR charge a fraction as much. The fee here buys the regime call, not the beta.
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads and limit orders matter more here than in the category's giants.
  • Launched in 2023, so the regime model has a short live record, and results hinge on Harbor reading the cycle correctly.harborcapital.com

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full MATR profile⁠

GMOD vs MATR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs MATR Cost

Overpaying MATR vs GMOD

$5,367

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • MATR 0.80%

    $15,346

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • MATR 0.80%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MATR $15,346GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearGMODMATROverpaying
10$900$1,422$522
20$3,460$5,393$1,933
30$9,979$15,346$5,367

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • 0.80%MATR
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

MATR 15th cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs MATR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
MATR 2.88%
Payout (12M)
GMOD No data
MATR $0.78
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
MATR $0.78
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
MATR Dec 19, 2025
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
MATR Dec 24, 2025
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
MATR Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
MATRAnnual · 3 paymentsAll MATR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2023 $0.57; Dec 20, 2024 $0.55; Dec 19, 2025 $0.78. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

GMOD vs MATR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025MATR 8.7%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025MATR 1.17
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025MATR −12.9%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48MATR 0.62

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MATRBvsENDWA

    Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MATRBvsPTBDA

    Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MATRBvsRISNA

    Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.