PTBD ranks 3rd and MATR 9th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
MATR vs PTBD
PTBD −0.20pt a year
0.80%0.60%
PTBD 25.8×the volume
72118.6K
MATR +10.3pt
+15.2%+4.9%
MATR vs PTBD Performance
+4.1%−0.1%
- MATR 0.80%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- MATR $10M
- PTBD $83M
- MATR +4.1%, better
- PTBD −0.1%
- MATR 2.88%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- MATR 27
- PTBD 1047
- MATR 721 sh
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- MATR $26.94
- PTBD $18.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MATR | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69 | A83Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | B55 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | C50Higher |
| Holdings | B69 | A90Higher |
| Durability | D35 | A83Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. MATR and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MATRB
PTBDA
In short
MATR Harbor's in-house macro team reads the business cycle, then sets the mix of stock, bond, commodity and currency ETFs to match it. A tactical allocation fund for investors who want the regime call outsourced, priced near the middle of its category.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
MATR The Fund seeks long-term total return while limiting downside risk. Its allocation is driven by regime modeling across multiple asset categories, including real estate investment trusts and commodities.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MATR vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MATR vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying MATR vs PTBD
$3,529
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MATR 0.80%
$15,346
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MATR | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $1,076 | $346 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $4,116 | $1,277 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $11,817 | $3,529 |
- 0.80%MATR
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
MATR 15th cheapest of 46 funds
MATR vs PTBD Dividends
- MATR 2.88%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- MATR $0.78
- PTBD $1.17
- MATR $0.78
- PTBD $0.10
- MATR Dec 19, 2025
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- MATR Dec 24, 2025
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- MATR Annual
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
MATR vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MATR 8.7%PTBD 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MATR 1.17, betterPTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- MATR −12.9%PTBD −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- MATR 0.62PTBD 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.