Skip to content

MATR vs PTBD

Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF

MATRBNYSE Arca

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PTBD −0.20pt a year

MATR0.80%PTBD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PTBD 25.8×the volume

MATR721PTBD18.6K

3Y return · a year

MATR +10.3pt

MATR+15.2%PTBD+4.9%

MATR vs PTBD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+4.1%MATR−0.1%PTBD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. MATR +4.1%. PTBD −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%2.5%7.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MATR 0.80%
PTBD 0.60%, better
Fund size
MATR $10M
PTBD $83M
1Y total return
MATR +4.1%, better
PTBD −0.1%
Yield (12M)
MATR 2.88%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Holdings
MATR 27
PTBD 1047
Avg volume (30D)
MATR 721 sh
PTBD 18.6K sh, better
NAV per share
MATR $26.94
PTBD $18.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MATR: Cost 69, Risk 55, Mission 80, Tradability 40, Holdings 69, Durability 35. PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 90, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for MATR, PTBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMATRPTBD
Cost30% weightB69A83Higher
Mission25% weightA80Not scored
Risk15% weightB55B60Higher
Tradability15% weightC40C50Higher
Holdings10% weightB69A90Higher
Durability5% weightD35A83Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MATR and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

PTBD ranks 3rd and MATR 9th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 9BDDXXDefined Duration 20 ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 9BMATRHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETFScore 63
  7. Rank 11BHEFTHedgeye Fourth Turning ETFScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MATRBHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

In short

MATR Harbor's in-house macro team reads the business cycle, then sets the mix of stock, bond, commodity and currency ETFs to match it. A tactical allocation fund for investors who want the regime call outsourced, priced near the middle of its category.

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

Stated mandate

MATR The Fund seeks long-term total return while limiting downside risk. Its allocation is driven by regime modeling across multiple asset categories, including real estate investment trusts and commodities.

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

Why people hold it

  • MATR Growth, liquidity and inflation signals define the current business-cycle regime, and each regime maps to a distinct blend of equity, fixed income, commodity and currency funds.harborcapital.com
  • Run in-house by Harbor's Multi-Asset Solutions Team, with a bottom-up research layer on top of the systematic model rather than a pure black box.harborcapital.com
  • The prospectus pairs long-term total return with limiting downside risk, and reaches into corners a plain 60/40 skips: REITs, commodities, high yield, emerging markets.streetinsider.com
  • At 0.80% a year, an actively managed tactical strategy priced essentially at the allocation-category median.
  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.

Worth knowing

  • MATR Plain-vanilla allocation peers such as AOA and IRTR charge a fraction as much. The fee here buys the regime call, not the beta.
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads and limit orders matter more here than in the category's giants.
  • Launched in 2023, so the regime model has a short live record, and results hinge on Harbor reading the cycle correctly.harborcapital.com
  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full MATR profile⁠

Full PTBD profile⁠

MATR vs PTBD Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MATR vs PTBD Cost

Overpaying MATR vs PTBD

$3,529

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MATR 0.80%

    $15,346

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MATR 0.80%
  • PTBD 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MATR $15,346PTBD $11,817

Year by year

YearMATRPTBDOverpaying
10$1,422$1,076$346
20$5,393$4,116$1,277
30$15,346$11,817$3,529

Expense ratio

  • 0.80%MATR
  • 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

MATR 15th cheapest of 46 funds

MATR vs PTBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
MATR 2.88%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Payout (12M)
MATR $0.78
PTBD $1.17
Last payment
MATR $0.78
PTBD $0.10
Ex-dividend
MATR Dec 19, 2025
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
Paid on
MATR Dec 24, 2025
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
Frequency
MATR Annual
PTBD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

MATRAnnual · 3 paymentsAll MATR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2023 $0.57; Dec 20, 2024 $0.55; Dec 19, 2025 $0.78. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

MATR vs PTBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MATR 8.7%PTBD 5.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MATR 1.17, betterPTBD 0.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MATR −12.9%since Sep 2023PTBD −24.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MATR 0.62PTBD 0.74

Popular comparisons

  • MATRBvsENDWA

    Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MATRBvsGMODA

    Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsGMODA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MATRBvsRISNA

    Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.