EWM ranks 4th and VNAM 11th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EWM vs VNAM
EWM −0.01pt a year
0.50%0.51%
EWM 26.7×the volume
206K7.72K
VNAM +1.9pt
+13.0%+14.9%
EWM vs VNAM Performance
+7.7%+9.6%
- EWM 0.50%, better
- VNAM 0.51%
- EWM $253M
- VNAM $34M
- EWM +7.7%
- VNAM +9.6%, better
- EWM 3.66%, better
- VNAM 0.51%
- EWM 25
- VNAM 71
- EWM 206K sh, better
- VNAM 7.72K sh
- EWM $26.98
- VNAM $24.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWM | VNAM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | A81 |
| Mission | D34Higher | F24 |
| Risk | A78Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | B57Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | C41 | |
| Durability | B58Higher | D27 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EWM and VNAM are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWMB
VNAMC
In short
EWM Malaysia in one ticker, running since 1996. EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia index, a cap-weighted slice of Kuala Lumpur's largest listed companies, and charges less than the typical single-country emerging markets fund.
VNAM Vietnam in a single US-listed ticker: about 70 locally listed large and mid caps, with index rules that stop one conglomerate from becoming the whole fund. It also prices under the typical single-country emerging-market ETF.
Stated mandate
EWM The fund seeks to track an index composed of Malaysian equities.
VNAM The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI Vietnam Select 25-50 Index before fees and expenses. It uses an indexing approach and invests primarily in securities represented by that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWM vs VNAM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWM vs VNAM Cost
Overpaying VNAM vs EWM
$186
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWM 0.50%
$9,979
VNAM 0.51%
$10,165
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWM | VNAM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $918 | $18 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,527 | $67 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $10,165 | $186 |
- 0.50%EWM, cheaper
- 0.51%VNAM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EWM 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
VNAM 5th cheapest of 21 funds
EWM vs VNAM Dividends
- EWM 3.66%, better
- VNAM 0.51%
- EWM $1.00
- VNAM $0.12
- EWM $0.57
- VNAM $0.03
- EWM Jun 15, 2026
- VNAM Jun 29, 2026
- EWM Jun 18, 2026
- VNAM Jul 7, 2026
- EWM Twice a year
- VNAM Twice a year
Distribution history
EWM vs VNAM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWM 13.0%, betterVNAM 20.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWM 0.68VNAM 0.74, better
- Worst fall
- EWM −22.2%VNAM −52.8%
- Market sensitivity
- EWM 0.46VNAM 1.15
EWM and VNAM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
