FLMX ranks 2nd and VNAM 11th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
FLMX vs VNAM
FLMX −0.32pt a year
0.19%0.51%
FLMX 1.8×the volume
14K7.72K
VNAM +0.8pt
+14.1%+14.9%
FLMX vs VNAM Performance
+18.8%+9.6%
- FLMX 0.19%, better
- VNAM 0.51%
- FLMX $81M
- VNAM $34M
- FLMX +18.8%, better
- VNAM +9.6%
- FLMX 3.75%, better
- VNAM 0.51%
- FLMX 38
- VNAM 71
- FLMX 14K sh, better
- VNAM 7.72K sh
- FLMX $37.48
- VNAM $24.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLMX | VNAM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A81 |
| Mission | B66Higher | F24 |
| Risk | B56Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | C51Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | B62 | |
| Durability | D37Higher | D27 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. FLMX and VNAM are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLMXA
VNAMC
In short
FLMX Mexico exposure at a discount. Franklin's tracker charges 0.19%, a fraction of what single-country emerging-market funds usually cost, and holds a compact basket of the country's largest listed companies.
VNAM Vietnam in a single US-listed ticker: about 70 locally listed large and mid caps, with index rules that stop one conglomerate from becoming the whole fund. It also prices under the typical single-country emerging-market ETF.
Stated mandate
FLMX The Fund seeks to track the performance of the FTSE Mexico Capped Index before fees and expenses through an indexing strategy, investing at least 80% of assets in index components or related exposure.
VNAM The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI Vietnam Select 25-50 Index before fees and expenses. It uses an indexing approach and invests primarily in securities represented by that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLMX vs VNAM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLMX vs VNAM Cost
Overpaying VNAM vs FLMX
$6,213
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLMX 0.19%
$3,952
VNAM 0.51%
$10,165
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLMX | VNAM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $918 | $571 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $3,527 | $2,176 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $10,165 | $6,213 |
- 0.19%FLMX, cheaper
- 0.51%VNAM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
FLMX cheapest of 21 funds
VNAM 5th cheapest of 21 funds
FLMX vs VNAM Dividends
- FLMX 3.75%, better
- VNAM 0.51%
- FLMX $1.42
- VNAM $0.12
- FLMX $0.72
- VNAM $0.03
- FLMX Jun 26, 2026
- VNAM Jun 29, 2026
- FLMX Jul 6, 2026
- VNAM Jul 7, 2026
- FLMX Twice a year
- VNAM Twice a year
Distribution history
FLMX vs VNAM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLMX 20.0%, betterVNAM 20.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLMX 0.55VNAM 0.74, better
- Worst fall
- FLMX −31.7%VNAM −52.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FLMX 1.08VNAM 1.15
FLMX and VNAM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
