EWW ranks 1st and VNAM 11th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EWW vs VNAM
EWW −0.01pt a year
0.50%0.51%
EWW 149.0×the volume
1.15M7.72K
VNAM +0.7pt
+14.2%+14.9%
EWW vs VNAM Performance
+18.3%+9.6%
- EWW 0.50%, better
- VNAM 0.51%
- EWW $1.67B
- VNAM $34M
- EWW +18.3%, better
- VNAM +9.6%
- EWW 3.18%, better
- VNAM 0.51%
- EWW 41
- VNAM 71
- EWW 1.15M sh, better
- VNAM 7.72K sh
- EWW $76.78
- VNAM $24.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWW | VNAM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | A81 |
| Mission | B68Higher | F24 |
| Risk | B56Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | B65 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | D27 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EWW and VNAM are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWWA
VNAMC
In short
EWW Mexico in one ticker, doing that job since 1996. Roughly 40 of the country's biggest listed names, capped so no single company runs the show, for 0.50% a year.
VNAM Vietnam in a single US-listed ticker: about 70 locally listed large and mid caps, with index rules that stop one conglomerate from becoming the whole fund. It also prices under the typical single-country emerging-market ETF.
Stated mandate
EWW The fund seeks to track an index composed of Mexican equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in Mexico.
VNAM The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI Vietnam Select 25-50 Index before fees and expenses. It uses an indexing approach and invests primarily in securities represented by that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWW vs VNAM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWW vs VNAM Cost
Overpaying VNAM vs EWW
$186
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWW 0.50%
$9,979
VNAM 0.51%
$10,165
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWW | VNAM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $918 | $18 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,527 | $67 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $10,165 | $186 |
- 0.50%EWW, cheaper
- 0.51%VNAM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EWW 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
VNAM 5th cheapest of 21 funds
EWW vs VNAM Dividends
- EWW 3.18%, better
- VNAM 0.51%
- EWW $2.46
- VNAM $0.12
- EWW $1.14
- VNAM $0.03
- EWW Jun 15, 2026
- VNAM Jun 29, 2026
- EWW Jun 18, 2026
- VNAM Jul 7, 2026
- EWW Twice a year
- VNAM Twice a year
Distribution history
EWW vs VNAM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWW 20.1%, betterVNAM 20.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWW 0.56VNAM 0.74, better
- Worst fall
- EWW −31.2%VNAM −52.8%
- Market sensitivity
- EWW 1.06VNAM 1.15
EWW and VNAM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
