EWP ranks 10th and FLKR 15th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWP vs FLKR
FLKR −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
FLKR 1.8×the volume
453K830K
EWP +2.4pt
+18.5%+16.1%
EWP vs FLKR Performance
+133.5%+110.9%
- EWP 0.50%
- FLKR 0.09%, better
- EWP $1.94B
- FLKR $1.79B
- EWP +15.7%
- FLKR +62.5%, better
- EWP 2.96%, better
- FLKR 2.92%
- EWP 25
- FLKR 148
- EWP 453K sh
- FLKR 830K sh, better
- EWP $56.31
- FLKR $51.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWP | FLKR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A79Higher | B57 |
| Risk | A70Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | B67Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | D34 | C50Higher |
| Durability | A75Higher | B60 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWP and FLKR are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWPB
FLKRB
In short
EWP Spain in one ticker. Trading since 1996, back when single-country ETFs were a novelty, EWP still does one job: track an index of Spanish equities and hold a capped basket of the country's largest listed companies.
FLKR Korea in one passive basket for 0.09% a year, a fraction of the 0.50% typical single-country fee. Roughly 160 Korean names tracking a capped FTSE index, run as plain index plumbing rather than a stock-picking bet.
Stated mandate
EWP The fund seeks to track an index composed of Spanish equities.
FLKR The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek returns that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWP vs FLKR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWP vs FLKR Cost
Overpaying EWP vs FLKR
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWP 0.50%
$9,979
FLKR 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWP | FLKR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWP
- 0.09%FLKR, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLKR cheapest of 38 funds
EWP 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWP vs FLKR Dividends
- EWP 2.96%, better
- FLKR 2.92%
- EWP $1.66
- FLKR $1.47
- EWP $0.92
- FLKR $0.30
- EWP Jun 15, 2026
- FLKR Jun 26, 2026
- EWP Jun 18, 2026
- FLKR Jul 6, 2026
- EWP Twice a year
- FLKR Twice a year
Distribution history
EWP vs FLKR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWP
- FLKR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWP 16.5%, betterFLKR 43.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWP 1.54, betterFLKR 0.97
- Worst fall
- EWP −30.2%, betterFLKR −41.3%
- Market sensitivity
- EWP 0.86FLKR 2.57
EWP and FLKR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





