QLD ranks 1st and EZJ 71st of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
EZJ vs QLD
QLD −0.29pt a year
1.18%0.89%
QLD 1266.7×the volume
3.27K4.15M
QLD +23.2pt
+8.8%+32.0%
EZJ vs QLD Performance
+39.8%+89.5%
- EZJ 1.18%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- EZJ $11M
- QLD $13.3B
- EZJ +22.7%, better
- QLD +7.6%
- EZJ 2.19%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- EZJ 3
- QLD 113
- EZJ 3.27K sh
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- EZJ $62.22
- QLD $82.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EZJ | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66 | B66 |
| Tradability | C54 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | D26 | A72Higher |
| Durability | B63 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. EZJ and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EZJD
QLDA
In short
EZJ The only US ETF built to track twice the MSCI Japan Index's daily move, listed since 2009. A daily-reset trade on Japan's large and mid caps, engineered for day-length holding periods.
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
Stated mandate
EZJ The fund seeks magnified positive daily exposure to the MSCI Japan Index, targeting twice the index's daily return before fees and expenses.
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EZJ vs QLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EZJ vs QLD Cost
Overpaying EZJ vs QLD
$4,671
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EZJ 1.18%
$21,543
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EZJ | QLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,065 | $1,576 | $489 |
| 20 | $7,697 | $5,953 | $1,744 |
| 30 | $21,543 | $16,872 | $4,671 |
- 1.18%EZJ
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
EZJ 85th cheapest of 95 funds
EZJ vs QLD Dividends
- EZJ 2.19%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- EZJ $1.38
- QLD $0.12
- EZJ $0.23
- QLD $0.03
- EZJ Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- EZJ Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- EZJ Quarterly
- QLD Quarterly
Distribution history
EZJ vs QLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EZJ
- QLD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EZJ 25.0%, betterQLD 36.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- EZJ 0.98QLD 1.04, better
- Worst fall
- EZJ −53.6%, betterQLD −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EZJ 1.24QLD 2.46
Popular comparisons
- 1.18% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

