ROM ranks 3rd and EZJ 71st of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
EZJ vs ROM
29.5%by weight
ROM −0.25pt a year
1.18%0.93%
ROM 14.6×the volume
3.27K47.7K
ROM +27.4pt
+8.8%+36.2%
EZJ vs ROM Performance
+39.8%+110.3%
- EZJ 1.18%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- EZJ $11M
- ROM $1.15B
- EZJ +22.7%, better
- ROM +19.3%
- EZJ 2.19%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- EZJ 3
- ROM 85
- EZJ 3.27K sh
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- EZJ $62.22
- ROM $132.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EZJ | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | C54 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | D26 | |
| Durability | B63 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. EZJ and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EZJD
ROMA
In short
EZJ The only US ETF built to track twice the MSCI Japan Index's daily move, listed since 2009. A daily-reset trade on Japan's large and mid caps, engineered for day-length holding periods.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
EZJ The fund seeks magnified positive daily exposure to the MSCI Japan Index, targeting twice the index's daily return before fees and expenses.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EZJ vs ROM Holdings
How EZJ and ROM differ
29.5%
Shared holdings make up 59.4% of EZJ and 32.3% of ROM.
Level by level
- Country0.0%
- Sector27.1%
- Holdings29.5%
Sector
| Sector | More in EZJMore in ROM | EZJ | ROM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | ROM +72.9 points | 22.2% | 95.1% |
| Industrials | EZJ +22.8 points | 22.8% | 0.0% |
| Financials | EZJ +14.4 points | 19.2% | 4.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | EZJ +11.1 points | 11.1% | 0.0% |
| Communication | EZJ +9.5 points | 9.5% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | EZJ +5.3 points | 5.3% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | EZJ +3.5 points | 3.5% | 0.0% |
| Materials | EZJ +2.8 points | 2.8% | 0.0% |
| Real Estate | EZJ +1.7 points | 1.7% | 0.0% |
| Utilities | EZJ +1.0 points | 1.0% | 0.0% |
| Energy | EZJ +0.9 points | 1.0% | 0.1% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in EZJMore in ROM | EZJ | ROM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | EZJ +100.0 points | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| United States | ROM +99.4 points | 0.0% | 99.4% |
| Other countries (2) | ROM +0.6 points | 0.0% | 0.6% |
Outside the US: EZJ 100% developed, 0% emerging.
Concentration
- EZJ100.0%
- ROM70.0%
- EZJ2
- ROM84
Asset class
- EZJ
- Equity
- ROM
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in EZJ1
- In both1
- Only in ROM83
Only in EZJ
1 security, 40.6% of EZJ by weight
- Ishares Msci Japan Etf40.63%
Only in ROM
83 securities, 67.7% of ROM by weight
- Apple Inc9.53%
- NVIDIA Corp9.38%
- Microsoft Corp7.34%
- Broadcom Inc2.94%
- Advanced Micro Devices2.83%
- Micron Technology Inc2.51%
- Palantir Technologies Inc-A1.62%
- Cisco Systems Inc1.58%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-121.47%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-241.39%
- Intel Corp1.25%
- Applied Materials Inc1.19%
- Lam Research Corp1.15%
- Palo Alto Networks Inc1.14%
- Texas Instruments Inc1.05%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Inc - A0.98%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-290.95%
- Intl Business Machines Corp0.93%
- Oracle Corp0.87%
- Kla Corp0.79%
- Analog Devices Inc0.78%
- Amphenol Corp-Cl A0.75%
- Salesforce Inc0.72%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-170.70%
- Arista Networks Inc0.68%
- Qualcomm Inc0.67%
- Marvell Technology Inc0.66%
- Sandisk Corp0.64%
- Accenture Plc-Cl A0.61%
- Seagate Technology Holdings0.56%
- Western Digital Corp0.51%
- Dell Technologies -C0.49%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-100.44%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-030.44%
- Servicenow Inc0.42%
- Adobe Inc0.38%
- Corning Inc0.37%
- Intuit Inc0.36%
- Cadence Design Sys Inc0.35%
- Synopsys Inc0.34%
- Fortinet Inc0.32%
- Motorola Solutions Inc0.31%
- Datadog Inc - Class A0.30%
- Lumentum Holdings Inc0.29%
- Hewlett Packard Enterprise0.28%
- Nxp Semiconductors NV0.25%
- Te Connectivity PLC0.24%
- Monolithic Power Systems Inc0.23%
- Autodesk Inc0.20%
- Keysight Technologies In0.20%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in EZJMore in ROM | EZJ | ROM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf | EZJ +29.90 points | 33.13% | 3.23% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EZJ vs ROM Cost
Overpaying EZJ vs ROM
$4,004
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EZJ 1.18%
$21,543
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EZJ | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,065 | $1,644 | $421 |
| 20 | $7,697 | $6,199 | $1,498 |
| 30 | $21,543 | $17,539 | $4,004 |
- 1.18%EZJ
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
EZJ 85th cheapest of 95 funds
EZJ vs ROM Dividends
- EZJ 2.19%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- EZJ $1.38
- ROM $0.04
- EZJ $0.23
- ROM $0.02
- EZJ Sep 23, 2026
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- EZJ Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- EZJ Quarterly
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
EZJ vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EZJ
- ROM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EZJ 25.0%, betterROM 49.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- EZJ 0.98, betterROM 0.97
- Worst fall
- EZJ −53.6%, betterROM −67.6%
- Market sensitivity
- EZJ 1.24ROM 3.09
EZJ and ROM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.18% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
