GUSE ranks 2nd and FBCG 34th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FBCG vs GUSE
GUSE −0.27pt a year
0.57%0.30%
FBCG 20.4×the volume
660K32.3K
FBCG vs GUSE Performance
+5.1%+11.4%
- FBCG 0.57%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- FBCG $7.31B
- GUSE $417M
- FBCG +7.0%
- GUSE
- FBCG 0.03%
- GUSE
- FBCG 204
- GUSE 122
- FBCG 660K sh, better
- GUSE 32.3K sh
- FBCG $57.62
- GUSE $43.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FBCG | GUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A97Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C44 | A95Higher |
| Tradability | A77Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | C50 | A85Higher |
| Durability | A94Higher | A85 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FBCG and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FBCGB
GUSEA
In short
FBCG Fidelity took its Blue Chip Growth stock-picking and put it in a ticker. Active, concentrated, US large-cap growth: a manager hunting well-known, well-capitalized companies with above-average growth potential, not an index basket.
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
Stated mandate
FBCG The fund seeks long-term capital growth, with income as a secondary objective.
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FBCG vs GUSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FBCG vs GUSE Cost
Overpaying FBCG vs GUSE
$5,122
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FBCG 0.57%
$11,271
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FBCG | GUSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,023 | $545 | $478 |
| 20 | $3,921 | $2,113 | $1,808 |
| 30 | $11,271 | $6,149 | $5,122 |
- 0.57%FBCG
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
FBCG 50th cheapest of 90 funds
FBCG vs GUSE Dividends
- FBCG 0.03%
- GUSE
- FBCG $0.02
- GUSE
- FBCG $0.02
- GUSE $0.30
- FBCG Dec 19, 2025
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- FBCG Dec 23, 2025
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- FBCG Twice a year
- GUSE Irregular
Distribution history
FBCG vs GUSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FBCG 19.8%GUSE
- Return per unit of risk
- FBCG 1.11GUSE
- Worst fall
- FBCG −43.5%GUSE
- Market sensitivity
- FBCG 1.38GUSE 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.