Skip to content

FBCG vs GUSE

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF

FBCGBCboe

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.27pt a year

FBCG0.57%GUSE0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

FBCG 20.4×the volume

FBCG660KGUSE32.3K

FBCG vs GUSE Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+5.1%FBCG+11.4%GUSE

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. FBCG +5.1%. GUSE +11.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%15%20%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FBCG 0.57%
GUSE 0.30%, better
Fund size
FBCG $7.31B
GUSE $417M
1Y total return
FBCG +7.0%
GUSE No data
Yield (12M)
FBCG 0.03%
GUSE No data
Holdings
FBCG 204
GUSE 122
Avg volume (30D)
FBCG 660K sh, better
GUSE 32.3K sh
NAV per share
FBCG $57.62
GUSE $43.96
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FBCG: Cost 47, Risk 44, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 50, Durability 94. GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 95, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 85, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for FBCG, GUSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFBCGGUSE
Cost30% weightC47A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC44A95Higher
Tradability15% weightA77HigherC46
Holdings10% weightC50A85Higher
Durability5% weightA94HigherA85

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FBCG and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and FBCG 34th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 83
  4. Rank 34BACGRAmerican Century Large Cap Growth ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 34BFBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 34CMFIGMotley Fool Innovative Growth ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FBCGBFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

In short

FBCG Fidelity took its Blue Chip Growth stock-picking and put it in a ticker. Active, concentrated, US large-cap growth: a manager hunting well-known, well-capitalized companies with above-average growth potential, not an index basket.

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

Stated mandate

FBCG The fund seeks long-term capital growth, with income as a secondary objective.

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

Why people hold it

  • FBCG The mandate is plain: long-term growth of capital, income second, US-listed companies, with at least 80% of assets in blue chip names. A concentrated book, not an index clone.yahoo.com
  • Actively traded and a multi-billion-dollar fund, so getting in and out during market hours is rarely the hard part with this one.
  • Live since 2020, and it lands in the upper half of its active US large-cap growth peer group on our overall read.
  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

Worth knowing

  • FBCG 0.57% a year sits a touch above the typical active US growth ETF, and Fidelity's own FELG aims at large-cap growth for 0.18%.
  • Concentration cuts both ways: with only a few dozen growth names, single stock calls move this fund harder than they would a broad index basket.
  • Income is an afterthought by design. Distributions land once or twice a year, not quarterly.
  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

Full FBCG profile⁠

Full GUSE profile⁠

FBCG vs GUSE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FBCG vs GUSE Cost

Overpaying FBCG vs GUSE

$5,122

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FBCG 0.57%

    $11,271

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FBCG 0.57%
  • GUSE 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530FBCG $11,271GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearFBCGGUSEOverpaying
10$1,023$545$478
20$3,921$2,113$1,808
30$11,271$6,149$5,122

Expense ratio

  • 0.57%FBCG
  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

FBCG 50th cheapest of 90 funds

FBCG vs GUSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
FBCG 0.03%
GUSE No data
Payout (12M)
FBCG $0.02
GUSE No data
Last payment
FBCG $0.02
GUSE $0.30
Ex-dividend
FBCG Dec 19, 2025
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
FBCG Dec 23, 2025
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
FBCG Twice a year
GUSE Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

FBCGTwice a year · 6 paymentsAll FBCG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2020 $0.002; Dec 15, 2023 $0.008; Sep 20, 2024 $0.003; Dec 20, 2024 $0.05; Sep 19, 2025 $0.005; Dec 19, 2025 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD
GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD

FBCG vs GUSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FBCG 19.8%GUSE No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FBCG 1.11GUSE No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FBCG −43.5%GUSE No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FBCG 1.38GUSE 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • FBCGBvsJUSAA

    Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.57% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FBCGBvsLRGCA

    Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.57% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FBCGBvsFELGA

    Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.57% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.