JUSA ranks 1st and FBCG 34th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FBCG vs JUSA
JUSA −0.39pt a year
0.57%0.18%
FBCG 5.9×the volume
660K112K
FBCG vs JUSA Performance
+7.0%+12.2%
- FBCG 0.57%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- FBCG $7.31B
- JUSA $871M
- FBCG +7.0%
- JUSA +12.2%, better
- FBCG 0.03%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- FBCG 204
- JUSA 264
- FBCG 660K sh, better
- JUSA 112K sh
- FBCG $57.62
- JUSA $65.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FBCG | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | C44 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | A77Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | C50 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A94Higher | A77 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FBCG and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FBCGB
JUSAA
In short
FBCG Fidelity took its Blue Chip Growth stock-picking and put it in a ticker. Active, concentrated, US large-cap growth: a manager hunting well-known, well-capitalized companies with above-average growth potential, not an index basket.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
FBCG The fund seeks long-term capital growth, with income as a secondary objective.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FBCG vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FBCG vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying FBCG vs JUSA
$7,522
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FBCG 0.57%
$11,271
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FBCG | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,023 | $328 | $695 |
| 20 | $3,921 | $1,281 | $2,640 |
| 30 | $11,271 | $3,749 | $7,522 |
- 0.57%FBCG
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
FBCG 50th cheapest of 90 funds
FBCG vs JUSA Dividends
- FBCG 0.03%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- FBCG $0.02
- JUSA $0.49
- FBCG $0.02
- JUSA $0.13
- FBCG Dec 19, 2025
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- FBCG Dec 23, 2025
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- FBCG Twice a year
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
FBCG vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FBCG 19.8%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FBCG 1.11JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- FBCG −43.5%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FBCG 1.38JUSA 0.98
FBCG and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.57% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

