LRGC ranks 3rd and FBCG 34th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FBCG vs LRGC
LRGC −0.18pt a year
0.57%0.39%
FBCG 19.5×the volume
660K34K
FBCG +4.2pt
+24.3%+20.1%
FBCG vs LRGC Performance
+7.0%+11.6%
- FBCG 0.57%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- FBCG $7.31B
- LRGC $1.33B
- FBCG +7.0%
- LRGC +11.6%, better
- FBCG 0.03%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- FBCG 204
- LRGC 73
- FBCG 660K sh, better
- LRGC 34K sh
- FBCG $57.62
- LRGC $83.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FBCG | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | C44 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | A77 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | C50 | A77Higher |
| Durability | A94Higher | A79 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FBCG and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FBCGB
LRGCA
In short
FBCG Fidelity took its Blue Chip Growth stock-picking and put it in a ticker. Active, concentrated, US large-cap growth: a manager hunting well-known, well-capitalized companies with above-average growth potential, not an index basket.
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
FBCG The fund seeks long-term capital growth, with income as a secondary objective.
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FBCG vs LRGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FBCG vs LRGC Cost
Overpaying FBCG vs LRGC
$3,373
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FBCG 0.57%
$11,271
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FBCG | LRGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,023 | $705 | $318 |
| 20 | $3,921 | $2,725 | $1,196 |
| 30 | $11,271 | $7,898 | $3,373 |
- 0.57%FBCG
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
FBCG 50th cheapest of 90 funds
FBCG vs LRGC Dividends
- FBCG 0.03%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- FBCG $0.02
- LRGC $0.45
- FBCG $0.02
- LRGC $0.45
- FBCG Dec 19, 2025
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- FBCG Dec 23, 2025
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- FBCG Twice a year
- LRGC Annual
Distribution history
FBCG vs LRGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FBCG 19.8%LRGC 12.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FBCG 1.11LRGC 1.26, better
- Worst fall
- FBCG −43.5%LRGC −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FBCG 1.38LRGC 1.00
FBCG and LRGC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
