ROM ranks 3rd and FDRX 84th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
FDRX vs ROM
0.0%by weight
ROM −0.15pt a year
1.08%0.93%
ROM 4.2×the volume
11.5K47.7K
FDRX vs ROM Performance
+11.2%+2.0%
- FDRX 1.08%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- FDRX $1M
- ROM $1.15B
- FDRX
- ROM +26.5%
- FDRX
- ROM 0.03%
- FDRX 1
- ROM 85
- FDRX 11.5K sh
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- FDRX $21.19
- ROM $132.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDRX | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D29 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. FDRX and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDRXD
ROMA
In short
FDRX Most of the leverage aisle is Dow and Nasdaq wrappers. FDRX points the same daily-reset machinery at a founder-led stock index and doubles the day's move (2x, not 3x). A one-day tool with a niche theme bolted on.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
FDRX The Fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to twice the Founder-Led Index’s daily performance for a single NAV day. It resets exposure daily and primarily uses derivatives such as total return swaps and futures.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDRX vs ROM Holdings
How FDRX and ROM differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of FDRX and 0.0% of ROM.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
- Country99.4%
Sector
No Sector split for FDRX.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FDRXMore in ROM | FDRX | ROM |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FDRX +0.6 points | 100.0% | 99.4% |
| Other countries (2) | ROM +0.6 points | 0.0% | 0.6% |
Concentration
- FDRX196.9%
- ROM70.0%
- FDRX0
- ROM84
Asset class
- FDRX
- Leveraged/Inverse
- ROM
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in FDRX0
- In both0
- Only in ROM84
Only in FDRX
0 securities, 0.0% of FDRX by weight
Only in ROM
84 securities, 70.9% of ROM by weight
- Apple Inc9.53%
- NVIDIA Corp9.38%
- Microsoft Corp7.34%
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf3.23%
- Broadcom Inc2.94%
- Advanced Micro Devices2.83%
- Micron Technology Inc2.51%
- Palantir Technologies Inc-A1.62%
- Cisco Systems Inc1.58%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-121.47%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-241.39%
- Intel Corp1.25%
- Applied Materials Inc1.19%
- Lam Research Corp1.15%
- Palo Alto Networks Inc1.14%
- Texas Instruments Inc1.05%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Inc - A0.98%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-290.95%
- Intl Business Machines Corp0.93%
- Oracle Corp0.87%
- Kla Corp0.79%
- Analog Devices Inc0.78%
- Amphenol Corp-Cl A0.75%
- Salesforce Inc0.72%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-170.70%
- Arista Networks Inc0.68%
- Qualcomm Inc0.67%
- Marvell Technology Inc0.66%
- Sandisk Corp0.64%
- Accenture Plc-Cl A0.61%
- Seagate Technology Holdings0.56%
- Western Digital Corp0.51%
- Dell Technologies -C0.49%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-100.44%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-030.44%
- Servicenow Inc0.42%
- Adobe Inc0.38%
- Corning Inc0.37%
- Intuit Inc0.36%
- Cadence Design Sys Inc0.35%
- Synopsys Inc0.34%
- Fortinet Inc0.32%
- Motorola Solutions Inc0.31%
- Datadog Inc - Class A0.30%
- Lumentum Holdings Inc0.29%
- Hewlett Packard Enterprise0.28%
- Nxp Semiconductors NV0.25%
- Te Connectivity PLC0.24%
- Monolithic Power Systems Inc0.23%
- Autodesk Inc0.20%
Weight gaps
FDRX and ROM share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDRX vs ROM Cost
Overpaying FDRX vs ROM
$2,435
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDRX 1.08%
$19,974
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDRX | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,898 | $1,644 | $254 |
| 20 | $7,106 | $6,199 | $907 |
| 30 | $19,974 | $17,539 | $2,435 |
- 1.08%FDRX
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
FDRX 81st cheapest of 95 funds
FDRX vs ROM Dividends
- FDRX
- ROM 0.03%
- FDRX None
- ROM $0.04
- FDRX
- ROM $0.02
- FDRX
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- FDRX
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- FDRX
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
FDRX vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDRX ROM 49.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDRX ROM 0.97
- Worst fall
- FDRX ROM −67.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FDRX 2.84ROM 3.09
Popular comparisons
- 1.08% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.08% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.08% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.