PSFJ ranks 2nd and FEBW 18th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
FEBW vs PSFJ
0.0%by weight
PSFJ −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
PSFJ 1.2×the volume
9.11K10.6K
PSFJ +3.9pt
+12.0%+15.9%
FEBW vs PSFJ Performance
+8.8%+9.4%
- FEBW 0.74%
- PSFJ 0.49%, better
- FEBW $204M
- PSFJ $57M
- FEBW +8.8%
- PSFJ +9.4%, better
- FEBW 0.00%
- PSFJ
- FEBW 2
- PSFJ 4
- FEBW 9.11K sh
- PSFJ 10.6K sh, better
- FEBW $36.58
- PSFJ $35.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEBW | PSFJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A85Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | C47 | C50Higher |
| Holdings | C54 | |
| Durability | C54 | B57Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. FEBW and PSFJ are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEBWC
PSFJB
In short
FEBW Deep-buffer S&P 500 exposure on a February clock: FLEX options absorb the first 20% of a year's losses, and a ceiling on the upside pays for that cushion. Priced at the category median, one rung in AllianzIM's monthly ladder.
PSFJ A 20% cushion against the S&P 500's first losses, paid for with a ceiling on the upside, reset every July 1. Pacer runs the trade for less than most of the deep-buffer crowd charges.
Stated mandate
FEBW The Fund seeks to provide a buffer against the first 20% of losses of its underlying ETF during the applicable outcome period, using FLEX Options that reference the underlying ETF.
PSFJ The Fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 20% of downside losses over an approximate one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEBW vs PSFJ Holdings
How FEBW and PSFJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of FEBW and 0.0% of PSFJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in FEBWMore in PSFJ | FEBW | PSFJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FEBWMore in PSFJ | FEBW | PSFJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- FEBW104.1%
- PSFJ103.2%
- FEBW2
- PSFJ3
Asset class
- FEBW
- Equity
- PSFJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in FEBW2
- In both0
- Only in PSFJ3
Only in FEBW
2 securities, 100% of FEBW by weight
- Spy 01/29/2027 5.19 C103.34%
- Spy 01/29/2027 692.04 P0.78%
Only in PSFJ
3 securities, 100% of PSFJ by weight
- Spy 06/30/2027 8.36 C98.85%
- Spy 06/30/2027 746.77 P3.27%
- Spy 06/30/2027 448.06 P0.29%
Weight gaps
FEBW and PSFJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEBW vs PSFJ Cost
Overpaying FEBW vs PSFJ
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEBW 0.74%
$14,307
PSFJ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEBW | PSFJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%FEBW
- 0.49%PSFJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFJ cheapest of 24 funds
FEBW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
FEBW vs PSFJ Dividends
- FEBW 0.00%
- PSFJ
- FEBW None
- PSFJ None
Distribution history
FEBW vs PSFJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEBW 5.1%, betterPSFJ 7.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FEBW 1.39PSFJ 1.51, better
- Worst fall
- FEBW −8.8%PSFJ −12.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FEBW 0.40PSFJ 0.55
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.