Skip to content

FEBW vs PSFJ

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETF

FEBWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

PSFJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSFJ −0.25pt a year

FEBW0.74%PSFJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSFJ 1.2×the volume

FEBW9.11KPSFJ10.6K

3Y return · a year

PSFJ +3.9pt

FEBW+12.0%PSFJ+15.9%

FEBW vs PSFJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.8%FEBW+9.4%PSFJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FEBW +8.8%. PSFJ +9.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FEBW 0.74%
PSFJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
FEBW $204M
PSFJ $57M
1Y total return
FEBW +8.8%
PSFJ +9.4%, better
Yield (12M)
FEBW 0.00%
PSFJ No data
Holdings
FEBW 2
PSFJ 4
Avg volume (30D)
FEBW 9.11K sh
PSFJ 10.6K sh, better
NAV per share
FEBW $36.58
PSFJ $35.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FEBW: Cost 37, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 47, Holdings 54, Durability 54. PSFJ: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for FEBW, PSFJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFEBWPSFJ
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC47HigherD29
Tradability15% weightC47C50Higher
Holdings10% weightC54Not scored
Durability5% weightC54B57Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FEBW and PSFJ are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFJ ranks 2nd and FEBW 18th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 17CAUGWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETFScore 46
  6. Rank 18CFEBWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETFScore 44
  7. Rank 19CMARWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Mar ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FEBWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETF

PSFJBPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

In short

FEBW Deep-buffer S&P 500 exposure on a February clock: FLEX options absorb the first 20% of a year's losses, and a ceiling on the upside pays for that cushion. Priced at the category median, one rung in AllianzIM's monthly ladder.

PSFJ A 20% cushion against the S&P 500's first losses, paid for with a ceiling on the upside, reset every July 1. Pacer runs the trade for less than most of the deep-buffer crowd charges.

Stated mandate

FEBW The Fund seeks to provide a buffer against the first 20% of losses of its underlying ETF during the applicable outcome period, using FLEX Options that reference the underlying ETF.

PSFJ The Fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 20% of downside losses over an approximate one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • FEBW Aims to buffer the first 20% of losses in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each outcome period, built from FLEX options rather than a manager's hedging hunch.
  • The terms are written down in advance: 20-point buffer, SPY as the reference, a February 1 to January 31 outcome period. You know the rules before you own it.
  • At 0.74%, it charges exactly the median for deep-buffer funds in its peer group. No premium for the AllianzIM name.
  • A February start date in a series that runs month by month (MAYW covers May), so entry points can be staggered across the calendar instead of stacked on one reset.
  • PSFJ Costs 0.49% a year against a 0.74% median for 20% S&P 500 buffer funds, and undercuts the 0.74% AllianzIM month-series funds (JUNW, AUGW, DECW) built on the same reference.
  • Deep cushion by design: it aims to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each roughly one-year period, before fees and expenses.paceretfs.com
  • Live since 2021, with several annual reset cycles behind it and sibling funds (PSFM, PSFD) covering other start months. One of the stronger builds in a crowded 20% buffer field.

Worth knowing

  • FEBW The cushion is bought with a ceiling. Each period's cap is set at the start and can shift year to year, so upside in a strong market is limited by design.
  • Buffer math runs from the period's start. Buy in mid-period and you inherit whatever protection and headroom remain, not a fresh 20 points.
  • Thinly traded, so the spread is a real part of your cost. Cheaper deep-buffer siblings exist too: PBFR at 0.50%, PSFJ at 0.49%.
  • PSFJ The price of the cushion is a ceiling. Upside is capped at a level set when each July outcome period begins, so a roaring market leaves gains on the table.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and the cushion remaining and the room left to run differ from the stated terms.paceretfs.com
  • A smaller, thinly traded fund, so spreads can run wider than in the biggest names in the group. Income is not part of the design either.

Full FEBW profile⁠

Full PSFJ profile⁠

FEBW vs PSFJ Holdings

As of

How FEBW and PSFJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of FEBW and 0.0% of PSFJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in FEBW and PSFJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in FEBWMore in PSFJ
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FEBW and PSFJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in FEBWMore in PSFJ
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FEBW104.1%
  • PSFJ103.2%

Securities held

  • FEBW2
  • PSFJ3

Asset class

FEBW
Equity
PSFJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FEBW2
  • In both0
  • Only in PSFJ3

Only in FEBW

2 securities, 100% of FEBW by weight

  • Spy 01/29/2027 5.19 C103.34%
  • Spy 01/29/2027 692.04 P0.78%

Only in PSFJ

3 securities, 100% of PSFJ by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 8.36 C98.85%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 746.77 P3.27%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 448.06 P0.29%

Weight gaps

FEBW and PSFJ share no securities.

All 5 FEBW holdings⁠All 7 PSFJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FEBW vs PSFJ Cost

Overpaying FEBW vs PSFJ

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FEBW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FEBW 0.74%
  • PSFJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FEBW $14,307PSFJ $9,792

Year by year

YearFEBWPSFJOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%FEBW
  • 0.49%PSFJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFJ cheapest of 24 funds

FEBW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

FEBW vs PSFJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FEBW 0.00%
PSFJ No data
Payout (12M)
FEBW None
PSFJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2024, same scale for both

FEBW1 paymentAll FEBW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2024. Jan 16, 2024 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.052024
PSFJAll PSFJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FEBW vs PSFJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FEBW 5.1%, betterPSFJ 7.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FEBW 1.39PSFJ 1.51, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FEBW −8.8%since Feb 2023PSFJ −12.2%since Nov 2021
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FEBW 0.40PSFJ 0.55

Popular comparisons

  • FEBWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEBWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEBWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.