PSFO ranks 4th and FEBW 18th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
FEBW vs PSFO
PSFO −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
FEBW 1.3×the volume
9.11K7.12K
PSFO +2.5pt
+12.0%+14.5%
FEBW vs PSFO Performance
+8.8%+11.5%
- FEBW 0.74%
- PSFO 0.49%, better
- FEBW $204M
- PSFO $47M
- FEBW +8.8%
- PSFO +11.5%, better
- FEBW 0.00%
- PSFO
- FEBW 2
- PSFO 4
- FEBW 9.11K sh, better
- PSFO 7.12K sh
- FEBW $36.58
- PSFO $35.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEBW | PSFO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | C47Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | C47Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | C54 | |
| Durability | C54 | B59Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. FEBW and PSFO are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEBWC
PSFOB
In short
FEBW Deep-buffer S&P 500 exposure on a February clock: FLEX options absorb the first 20% of a year's losses, and a ceiling on the upside pays for that cushion. Priced at the category median, one rung in AllianzIM's monthly ladder.
PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.
Stated mandate
FEBW The Fund seeks to provide a buffer against the first 20% of losses of its underlying ETF during the applicable outcome period, using FLEX Options that reference the underlying ETF.
PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEBW vs PSFO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEBW vs PSFO Cost
Overpaying FEBW vs PSFO
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEBW 0.74%
$14,307
PSFO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEBW | PSFO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%FEBW
- 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFO cheapest of 24 funds
FEBW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
FEBW vs PSFO Dividends
- FEBW 0.00%
- PSFO
- FEBW None
- PSFO None
Distribution history
FEBW vs PSFO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEBW 5.1%, betterPSFO 6.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FEBW 1.39, betterPSFO 1.38
- Worst fall
- FEBW −8.8%PSFO −12.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FEBW 0.40PSFO 0.50
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.