Skip to content

FEBW vs PSFO

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETF

FEBWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

PSFOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFO −0.25pt a year

FEBW0.74%PSFO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

FEBW 1.3×the volume

FEBW9.11KPSFO7.12K

3Y return · a year

PSFO +2.5pt

FEBW+12.0%PSFO+14.5%

FEBW vs PSFO Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.8%FEBW+11.5%PSFO

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FEBW +8.8%. PSFO +11.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FEBW 0.74%
PSFO 0.49%, better
Fund size
FEBW $204M
PSFO $47M
1Y total return
FEBW +8.8%
PSFO +11.5%, better
Yield (12M)
FEBW 0.00%
PSFO No data
Holdings
FEBW 2
PSFO 4
Avg volume (30D)
FEBW 9.11K sh, better
PSFO 7.12K sh
NAV per share
FEBW $36.58
PSFO $35.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FEBW: Cost 37, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 47, Holdings 54, Durability 54. PSFO: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission 95, Tradability 44, Holdings not scored, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for FEBW, PSFO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFEBWPSFO
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightC47HigherD29
Tradability15% weightC47HigherC44
Holdings10% weightC54Not scored
Durability5% weightC54B59Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FEBW and PSFO are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFO ranks 4th and FEBW 18th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 5BPSFMPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 17CAUGWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETFScore 46
  7. Rank 18CFEBWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETFScore 44
  8. Rank 19CMARWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Mar ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FEBWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETF

PSFOBPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

In short

FEBW Deep-buffer S&P 500 exposure on a February clock: FLEX options absorb the first 20% of a year's losses, and a ceiling on the upside pays for that cushion. Priced at the category median, one rung in AllianzIM's monthly ladder.

PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.

Stated mandate

FEBW The Fund seeks to provide a buffer against the first 20% of losses of its underlying ETF during the applicable outcome period, using FLEX Options that reference the underlying ETF.

PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

Why people hold it

  • FEBW Aims to buffer the first 20% of losses in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each outcome period, built from FLEX options rather than a manager's hedging hunch.
  • The terms are written down in advance: 20-point buffer, SPY as the reference, a February 1 to January 31 outcome period. You know the rules before you own it.
  • At 0.74%, it charges exactly the median for deep-buffer funds in its peer group. No premium for the AllianzIM name.
  • A February start date in a series that runs month by month (MAYW covers May), so entry points can be staggered across the calendar instead of stacked on one reset.
  • PSFO 0.49% a year, below the median fee in its S&P 500 buffer cohort and well under peers like PMAY (0.79%) and BUFZ (0.95%).
  • Built to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) over each outcome period before the fund itself starts taking losses.
  • A 1940 Act ETF holding its own option package, not a bank-issued note, so no third-party credit sits between you and the payoff. Running since 2021.
  • Rates in the upper tier of a two-dozen-fund group of S&P 500 buffer strategies, largely on price.

Worth knowing

  • FEBW The cushion is bought with a ceiling. Each period's cap is set at the start and can shift year to year, so upside in a strong market is limited by design.
  • Buffer math runs from the period's start. Buy in mid-period and you inherit whatever protection and headroom remain, not a fresh 20 points.
  • Thinly traded, so the spread is a real part of your cost. Cheaper deep-buffer siblings exist too: PBFR at 0.50%, PSFJ at 0.49%.
  • PSFO The price of the cushion: gains stop at a cap fixed at the start of each period, and the fund hasn't been an income payer.
  • Buffer and cap are engineered for the full October 1 to September 30 stretch. Buy mid-period and your real cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.
  • Small asset base and light trading, which usually means wider spreads and more attention needed on how orders get entered.

Full FEBW profile⁠

Full PSFO profile⁠

FEBW vs PSFO Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FEBW vs PSFO Cost

Overpaying FEBW vs PSFO

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FEBW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FEBW 0.74%
  • PSFO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FEBW $14,307PSFO $9,792

Year by year

YearFEBWPSFOOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%FEBW
  • 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFO cheapest of 24 funds

FEBW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

FEBW vs PSFO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FEBW 0.00%
PSFO No data
Payout (12M)
FEBW None
PSFO None

Distribution history

Per share, 2024, same scale for both

FEBW1 paymentAll FEBW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2024. Jan 16, 2024 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.052024
PSFOAll PSFO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FEBW vs PSFO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FEBW 5.1%, betterPSFO 6.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FEBW 1.39, betterPSFO 1.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FEBW −8.8%since Feb 2023PSFO −12.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FEBW 0.40PSFO 0.50

Popular comparisons

  • FEBWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEBWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEBWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.