FELG ranks 4th and FFOG 21st of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs FFOG
FELG −0.23pt a year
0.18%0.41%
FELG 9.2×the volume
379K41.4K
FELG vs FFOG Performance
−0.5%−4.9%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- FFOG 0.41%
- FELG $5.78B
- FFOG $361M
- FELG −0.5%, better
- FFOG −4.9%
- FELG 0.37%
- FFOG
- FELG 133
- FFOG 40
- FELG 379K sh, better
- FFOG 41.4K sh
- FELG $42.20
- FFOG $46.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | FFOG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A77 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C51Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | C52 | B58Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | A85 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and FFOG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
FFOGB
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
FFOG Franklin's high-conviction growth sleeve: roughly 40 stocks picked with daily manager discretion, no index to copy, at a fee that undercuts most active growth rivals. Concentration is the whole point.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
FFOG The Fund seeks capital appreciation. It is an actively managed ETF investing predominantly in equity securities of companies the manager considers compelling growth opportunities, with daily portfolio discretion rather than an index-replication mandate.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs FFOG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs FFOG Cost
Overpaying FFOG vs FELG
$4,532
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
FFOG 0.41%
$8,281
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | FFOG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $741 | $413 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,860 | $1,579 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $8,281 | $4,532 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.41%FFOG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
FFOG 21st cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs FFOG Dividends
- FELG 0.37%
- FFOG
- FELG $0.16
- FFOG None
- FELG $0.04
- FFOG
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- FFOG
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- FFOG
- FELG Quarterly
- FFOG
Distribution history
FELG vs FFOG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%FFOG 21.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93FFOG 0.76
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%FFOG −25.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23FFOG 1.48
FELG and FFOG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
