Skip to content
etf.net

FFOG vs LRGC

Franklin Focused Growth ETF

FFOGBCboe

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.02pt a year

FFOG0.41%LRGC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

FFOG 1.2×the volume

FFOG41.4KLRGC34.1K

FFOG vs LRGC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−4.9%FFOG+9.5%LRGC

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FFOG −4.9%. LRGC +9.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%0%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FFOG 0.41%
LRGC 0.39%, better
Fund size
FFOG $361M
LRGC $1.37B
1Y total return
FFOG −4.9%
LRGC +9.5%, better
Yield (12M)
FFOG No data
LRGC 0.53%
Holdings
FFOG 40
LRGC 72
Avg volume (30D)
FFOG 41.4K sh, better
LRGC 34.1K sh
NAV per share
FFOG $46.87
LRGC $85.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FFOG: Cost 77, Risk 25, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings 58, Durability 85. LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for FFOG, LRGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFFOGLRGC
Cost30% weightA77A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA79
Risk15% weightD25A90Higher
Tradability15% weightB62A75Higher
Holdings10% weightB58A77Higher
Durability5% weightA85HigherA78

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FFOG and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and FFOG 21st of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 21BBKCGBNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETFScore 61
  6. Rank 21BFFOGFranklin Focused Growth ETFScore 61
  7. Rank 21BGSGOGoldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FFOGBFranklin Focused Growth ETF

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

In short

FFOG Franklin's high-conviction growth sleeve: roughly 40 stocks picked with daily manager discretion, no index to copy, at a fee that undercuts most active growth rivals. Concentration is the whole point.

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

Stated mandate

FFOG The Fund seeks capital appreciation. It is an actively managed ETF investing predominantly in equity securities of companies the manager considers compelling growth opportunities, with daily portfolio discretion rather than an index-replication mandate.

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

Why people hold it

  • FFOG At 0.41%, it undercuts the typical fee in its active growth peer group and most funds measured against the same Russell 1000 Growth benchmark.
  • About 40 names, not 400. The manager backs chosen ideas with daily discretion instead of replicating an index, using Russell 1000 Growth as a yardstick.
  • Running since 2016 and one of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.
  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

Worth knowing

  • FFOG Concentration cuts both ways. With roughly 40 holdings, a single stumble lands harder here than in a broad index fund holding hundreds of stocks.
  • Outcomes hinge on the manager's stock calls. There's no index-replication mandate, so the portfolio can sit well away from Russell 1000 Growth in either direction.
  • A mid-sized, moderately traded fund, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than on the giant index growth ETFs, especially in choppy sessions.
  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

Full FFOG profile⁠

Full LRGC profile⁠

FFOG vs LRGC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FFOG vs LRGC Cost

Overpaying FFOG vs LRGC

$383

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FFOG 0.41%

    $8,281

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FFOG 0.41%
  • LRGC 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530FFOG $8,281LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearFFOGLRGCOverpaying
10$741$705$36
20$2,860$2,725$135
30$8,281$7,898$383

Expense ratio

  • 0.41%FFOG
  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

FFOG 21st cheapest of 90 funds

FFOG vs LRGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FFOG No data
LRGC 0.53%
Payout (12M)
FFOG None
LRGC $0.45
Last payment
FFOG No data
LRGC $0.45
Ex-dividend
FFOG No data
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
FFOG No data
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
Frequency
FFOG No data
LRGC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

FFOGAll FFOG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

FFOG vs LRGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FFOG 21.1%since Dec 2023LRGC 12.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FFOG 0.76since Dec 2023LRGC 1.26
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FFOG −25.4%since Nov 2023LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FFOG 1.48LRGC 1.00

FFOG and LRGC in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • FFOGBvsJUSAA

    Franklin Focused Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.41% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FFOGBvsGUSEA

    Franklin Focused Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.41% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FFOGBvsFELGA

    Franklin Focused Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.41% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.