JUSA ranks 1st and FFOG 21st of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FFOG vs JUSA
JUSA −0.23pt a year
0.41%0.18%
JUSA 2.4×the volume
41.4K98.8K
FFOG vs JUSA Performance
−4.9%+10.8%
- FFOG 0.41%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- FFOG $361M
- JUSA $745M
- FFOG −4.9%
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- FFOG
- JUSA 0.72%
- FFOG 40
- JUSA 263
- FFOG 41.4K sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- FFOG $46.87
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FFOG | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | D25 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | B62Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | B58 | A84Higher |
| Durability | A85Higher | A76 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FFOG and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FFOGB
JUSAA
In short
FFOG Franklin's high-conviction growth sleeve: roughly 40 stocks picked with daily manager discretion, no index to copy, at a fee that undercuts most active growth rivals. Concentration is the whole point.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
FFOG The Fund seeks capital appreciation. It is an actively managed ETF investing predominantly in equity securities of companies the manager considers compelling growth opportunities, with daily portfolio discretion rather than an index-replication mandate.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FFOG vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FFOG vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying FFOG vs JUSA
$4,532
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FFOG 0.41%
$8,281
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FFOG | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $741 | $328 | $413 |
| 20 | $2,860 | $1,281 | $1,579 |
| 30 | $8,281 | $3,749 | $4,532 |
- 0.41%FFOG
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
FFOG 21st cheapest of 90 funds
FFOG vs JUSA Dividends
- FFOG
- JUSA 0.72%
- FFOG None
- JUSA $0.49
- FFOG
- JUSA $0.13
- FFOG
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- FFOG
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- FFOG
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
FFOG vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FFOG 21.1%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FFOG 0.76JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- FFOG −25.4%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FFOG 1.48JUSA 0.98
FFOG and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.41% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

