FELG ranks 4th and GARY 59th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs GARY
FELG −0.59pt a year
0.18%0.77%
FELG 36.9×the volume
379K10.3K
FELG vs GARY Performance
+0.4%+26.6%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- GARY 0.77%
- FELG $5.78B
- GARY $290M
- FELG −1.7%
- GARY
- FELG 0.37%
- GARY
- FELG 132
- GARY 39
- FELG 379K sh, better
- GARY 10.3K sh
- FELG $42.20
- GARY $26.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | GARY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F15 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C51 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | A85Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | C52 | B65Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | C51 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and GARY are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
GARYC
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
GARY Mango skips the enhanced-index playbook most peers run: quant screens plus fundamental research, hunting secular and thematic growers with strong earnings power. Launched in 2025 and priced like the active fund it is.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
GARY The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active investment primarily in common stocks of companies with high growth characteristics. Its process combines quantitative analysis with fundamental research and generally emphasizes large-capitalization companies, while allowing investments across company sizes.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs GARY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs GARY Cost
Overpaying GARY vs FELG
$11,080
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
GARY 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | GARY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,371 | $1,043 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $5,205 | $3,924 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $14,829 | $11,080 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.77%GARY
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
GARY 76th cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs GARY Dividends
- FELG 0.37%
- GARY
- FELG $0.16
- GARY
- FELG $0.04
- GARY $0.01
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- GARY Dec 30, 2025
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- GARY Jan 7, 2026
- FELG Quarterly
- GARY Irregular
Distribution history
FELG vs GARY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%GARY
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93GARY
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%GARY
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23GARY 1.19
FELG and GARY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
