FELG ranks 4th and IWFG 30th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs IWFG
FELG −0.28pt a year
0.18%0.46%
FELG 37.8×the volume
379K10K
FELG vs IWFG Performance
−0.5%−6.2%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- IWFG 0.46%
- FELG $5.78B
- IWFG $64M
- FELG −0.5%, better
- IWFG −6.2%
- FELG 0.37%, better
- IWFG 0.00%
- FELG 133
- IWFG 28
- FELG 379K sh, better
- IWFG 10K sh
- FELG $42.20
- IWFG $51.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | IWFG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A71 |
| Mission | A82Higher | A75 |
| Risk | C51Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | C52Higher | D38 |
| Durability | A95Higher | C47 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and IWFG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
IWFGB
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
IWFG Winslow Capital is a growth-only shop, and IWFG is its concentrated cut: roughly two dozen US large-cap growth names, non-diversified by design, at 0.46% net of a waiver through August 28, 2027.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
IWFG The Fund’s stated objective is long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs IWFG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs IWFG Cost
Overpaying IWFG vs FELG
$5,481
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
IWFG 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | IWFG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $830 | $502 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $3,195 | $1,914 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $9,230 | $5,481 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.46%IWFG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
IWFG 28th cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs IWFG Dividends
- FELG 0.37%, better
- IWFG 0.00%
- FELG $0.16
- IWFG None
- FELG $0.04
- IWFG
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- IWFG
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- IWFG
- FELG Quarterly
- IWFG
Distribution history
FELG vs IWFG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%IWFG 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93IWFG 0.94
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%IWFG −22.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23IWFG 1.14
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
