JUSA ranks 1st and IWFG 30th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
IWFG vs JUSA
JUSA −0.28pt a year
0.46%0.18%
JUSA 9.8×the volume
10K98.8K
IWFG vs JUSA Performance
−6.2%+10.8%
- IWFG 0.46%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- IWFG $64M
- JUSA $745M
- IWFG −6.2%
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- IWFG 0.00%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- IWFG 28
- JUSA 263
- IWFG 10K sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- IWFG $51.91
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWFG | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A75 | A84Higher |
| Risk | D39 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | B65Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | D38 | A84Higher |
| Durability | C47 | A76Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. IWFG and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWFGB
JUSAA
In short
IWFG Winslow Capital is a growth-only shop, and IWFG is its concentrated cut: roughly two dozen US large-cap growth names, non-diversified by design, at 0.46% net of a waiver through August 28, 2027.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
IWFG The Fund’s stated objective is long-term capital appreciation.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWFG vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWFG vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying IWFG vs JUSA
$5,481
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWFG 0.46%
$9,230
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWFG | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $830 | $328 | $502 |
| 20 | $3,195 | $1,281 | $1,914 |
| 30 | $9,230 | $3,749 | $5,481 |
- 0.46%IWFG
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
IWFG 28th cheapest of 90 funds
IWFG vs JUSA Dividends
- IWFG 0.00%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- IWFG None
- JUSA $0.49
- IWFG
- JUSA $0.13
- IWFG
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- IWFG
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- IWFG
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
IWFG vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWFG 17.6%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IWFG 0.94JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- IWFG −22.0%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- IWFG 1.14JUSA 0.98
IWFG and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.46% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

