GUSE ranks 2nd and IWFG 30th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
GUSE vs IWFG
GUSE −0.16pt a year
0.30%0.46%
GUSE 2.5×the volume
24.9K10K
GUSE vs IWFG Performance
+11.8%−2.9%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- IWFG 0.46%
- GUSE $421M
- IWFG $64M
- GUSE
- IWFG −6.2%
- GUSE
- IWFG 0.00%
- GUSE 122
- IWFG 28
- GUSE 24.9K sh, better
- IWFG 10K sh
- GUSE $46.05
- IWFG $51.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GUSE | IWFG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A71 |
| Mission | A75 | |
| Risk | A94Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | C46 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A89Higher | D38 |
| Durability | A85Higher | C47 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. GUSE and IWFG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GUSEA
IWFGB
In short
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
IWFG Winslow Capital is a growth-only shop, and IWFG is its concentrated cut: roughly two dozen US large-cap growth names, non-diversified by design, at 0.46% net of a waiver through August 28, 2027.
Stated mandate
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
IWFG The Fund’s stated objective is long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GUSE vs IWFG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GUSE vs IWFG Cost
Overpaying IWFG vs GUSE
$3,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
IWFG 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GUSE | IWFG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $830 | $285 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,195 | $1,082 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $9,230 | $3,081 |
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- 0.46%IWFG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
IWFG 28th cheapest of 90 funds
GUSE vs IWFG Dividends
- GUSE
- IWFG 0.00%
- GUSE
- IWFG None
- GUSE $0.30
- IWFG
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- IWFG
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- IWFG
- GUSE Irregular
- IWFG
Distribution history
GUSE vs IWFG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GUSE IWFG 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- GUSE IWFG 0.94
- Worst fall
- GUSE IWFG −22.0%
- Market sensitivity
- GUSE 0.93IWFG 1.14
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.