FELG ranks 4th and MAGS 9th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs MAGS
FELG −0.12pt a year
0.18%0.30%
MAGS 11.4×the volume
379K4.31M
FELG vs MAGS Performance
−0.5%+2.2%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- MAGS 0.30%
- FELG $5.78B
- MAGS $5.28B
- FELG −0.5%
- MAGS +2.2%, better
- FELG 0.37%
- MAGS 1.43%, better
- FELG 133
- MAGS 32
- FELG 379K sh
- MAGS 4.31M sh, better
- FELG $42.20
- MAGS $68.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | MAGS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A97 |
| Mission | A82Higher | B67 |
| Risk | C51Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | A77 |
| Holdings | C52Higher | F9 |
| Durability | A95Higher | A84 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and MAGS are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
MAGSB
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
MAGS Seven stocks, one ticker. MAGS is an actively managed fund built entirely around the Magnificent Seven basket, launched in 2023 for people who want that trade whole rather than assembled by hand.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
MAGS The Fund is actively managed and seeks growth of capital through exposure to companies comprising the Magnificent Seven.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs MAGS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs MAGS Cost
Overpaying MAGS vs FELG
$2,400
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
MAGS 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | MAGS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $545 | $217 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,113 | $832 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $6,149 | $2,400 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.30%MAGS
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
MAGS 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs MAGS Dividends
- FELG 0.37%
- MAGS 1.43%, better
- FELG $0.16
- MAGS $0.98
- FELG $0.04
- MAGS $0.98
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- MAGS Dec 30, 2025
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- MAGS Dec 31, 2025
- FELG Quarterly
- MAGS Annual
Distribution history
FELG vs MAGS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%MAGS 21.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93MAGS 1.28
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%MAGS −29.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23MAGS 1.37
FELG and MAGS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

