Skip to content
etf.net

LRGC vs MAGS

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF

MAGSBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

MAGS −0.09pt a year

LRGC0.39%MAGS0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

MAGS 126.6×the volume

LRGC34.1KMAGS4.31M

3Y return · a year

MAGS +13.1pt

LRGC+21.5%MAGS+34.6%

LRGC vs MAGS Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.5%LRGC+2.2%MAGS

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. LRGC +9.5%. MAGS +2.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LRGC 0.39%
MAGS 0.30%, better
Fund size
LRGC $1.37B
MAGS $5.28B
1Y total return
LRGC +9.5%, better
MAGS +2.2%
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
MAGS 1.43%, better
Holdings
LRGC 72
MAGS 32
Avg volume (30D)
LRGC 34.1K sh
MAGS 4.31M sh, better
NAV per share
LRGC $85.00
MAGS $68.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78. MAGS: Cost 97, Risk 36, Mission 67, Tradability 77, Holdings 9, Durability 84.
Pillar letters and Scores for LRGC, MAGS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLRGCMAGS
Cost30% weightA82A97Higher
Mission25% weightA79HigherB67
Risk15% weightA90HigherD36
Tradability15% weightA75A77Higher
Holdings10% weightA77HigherF9
Durability5% weightA78A84Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LRGC and MAGS are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and MAGS 9th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 9BFLCGFederated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETFScore 68
  6. Rank 9BMAGSRoundhill Magnificent Seven ETFScore 68
  7. Rank 12BFFLGFidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETFScore 67

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

MAGSBRoundhill Magnificent Seven ETF

In short

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

MAGS Seven stocks, one ticker. MAGS is an actively managed fund built entirely around the Magnificent Seven basket, launched in 2023 for people who want that trade whole rather than assembled by hand.

Stated mandate

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

MAGS The Fund is actively managed and seeks growth of capital through exposure to companies comprising the Magnificent Seven.

Why people hold it

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com
  • MAGS Packages the Magnificent Seven into a single actively managed position, so you skip buying and rebalancing seven separate stocks yourself.
  • Charges 0.30% a year, less than the typical actively managed US growth fund it competes with.
  • Among the most heavily traded funds in its category, which generally means low friction getting in and out.
  • A billion-dollar-scale fund and one of the strongest implementations in its active US growth peer group.

Worth knowing

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.
  • MAGS Concentration is the whole design. With a handful of megacap names, one stock stumbling moves this fund far more than it would a broad index fund.
  • Broader large-cap growth peers cost less: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%, though neither is a dedicated Magnificent Seven basket.
  • The mandate is growth of capital, and payouts come annually or semiannually at most. Not built as an income holding.

Full LRGC profile⁠

Full MAGS profile⁠

LRGC vs MAGS Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LRGC vs MAGS Cost

Overpaying LRGC vs MAGS

$1,749

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

  • MAGS 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LRGC 0.39%
  • MAGS 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530LRGC $7,898MAGS $6,149

Year by year

YearLRGCMAGSOverpaying
10$705$545$160
20$2,725$2,113$612
30$7,898$6,149$1,749

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%LRGC
  • 0.30%MAGS, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

MAGS 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

LRGC vs MAGS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
MAGS 1.43%, better
Payout (12M)
LRGC $0.45
MAGS $0.98
Last payment
LRGC $0.45
MAGS $0.98
Ex-dividend
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
MAGS Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
MAGS Dec 31, 2025
Frequency
LRGC Annual
MAGS Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
MAGSAnnual · 3 paymentsAll MAGS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $0.15; Dec 30, 2024 $0.44; Dec 30, 2025 $0.98. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD

LRGC vs MAGS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LRGC 12.7%, betterMAGS 21.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LRGC 1.26MAGS 1.28, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023MAGS −29.9%since Apr 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LRGC 1.00MAGS 1.37

LRGC and MAGS in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MAGSBvsJUSAA

    Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MAGSBvsGUSEA

    Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MAGSBvsFELGA

    Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.