JUSA ranks 1st and MAGS 9th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JUSA vs MAGS
JUSA −0.12pt a year
0.18%0.30%
MAGS 43.7×the volume
98.8K4.31M
JUSA vs MAGS Performance
+10.8%+2.2%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- MAGS 0.30%
- JUSA $745M
- MAGS $5.28B
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- MAGS +2.2%
- JUSA 0.72%
- MAGS 1.43%, better
- JUSA 263
- MAGS 32
- JUSA 98.8K sh
- MAGS 4.31M sh, better
- JUSA $67.75
- MAGS $68.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUSA | MAGS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A97 |
| Mission | A84Higher | B67 |
| Risk | A92Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | B58 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | F9 |
| Durability | A76 | A84Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JUSA and MAGS are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUSAA
MAGSB
In short
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
MAGS Seven stocks, one ticker. MAGS is an actively managed fund built entirely around the Magnificent Seven basket, launched in 2023 for people who want that trade whole rather than assembled by hand.
Stated mandate
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
MAGS The Fund is actively managed and seeks growth of capital through exposure to companies comprising the Magnificent Seven.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUSA vs MAGS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUSA vs MAGS Cost
Overpaying MAGS vs JUSA
$2,400
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
MAGS 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUSA | MAGS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $545 | $217 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,113 | $832 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $6,149 | $2,400 |
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- 0.30%MAGS
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
MAGS 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
JUSA vs MAGS Dividends
- JUSA 0.72%
- MAGS 1.43%, better
- JUSA $0.49
- MAGS $0.98
- JUSA $0.13
- MAGS $0.98
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- MAGS Dec 30, 2025
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- MAGS Dec 31, 2025
- JUSA Quarterly
- MAGS Annual
Distribution history
JUSA vs MAGS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUSA 11.6%MAGS 21.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- JUSA 1.41MAGS 1.28
- Worst fall
- JUSA −14.0%MAGS −29.9%
- Market sensitivity
- JUSA 0.98MAGS 1.37
JUSA and MAGS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


