Skip to content

FELG vs REGS

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

FELGANYSE Arca

Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF

REGSANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FELG −0.17pt a year

FELG0.18%REGS0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

FELG 11.0×the volume

FELG379KREGS34.4K

FELG vs REGS Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.6%FELG−0.7%REGS

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. FELG −0.6%. REGS −0.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.2%4%6%8%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FELG 0.18%, better
REGS 0.35%
Fund size
FELG $5.78B
REGS $77M
1Y total return
FELG −0.5%
REGS No data
Yield (12M)
FELG 0.37%
REGS No data
Holdings
FELG 133
REGS 57
Avg volume (30D)
FELG 379K sh, better
REGS 34.4K sh
NAV per share
FELG $42.20
REGS $11.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FELG: Cost 99, Risk 51, Mission 82, Tradability 85, Holdings 52, Durability 95. REGS: Cost 93, Risk 83, Mission not scored, Tradability 40, Holdings 70, Durability 58.
Pillar letters and Scores for FELG, REGS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFELGREGS
Cost30% weightA99HigherA93
Mission25% weightA82Not scored
Risk15% weightC51A83Higher
Tradability15% weightA85HigherC40
Holdings10% weightC52A70Higher
Durability5% weightA95HigherB58

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FELG and REGS are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

FELG ranks 4th and REGS 6th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 5AGQQQAstoria US Quality Growth Kings ETFScore 77
  6. Rank 6AREGSColumbia Large Cap Growth ETFScore 75
  7. Rank 7ATGRTT. Rowe Price Growth ETFScore 72

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FELGAFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

REGSAColumbia Large Cap Growth ETF

In short

FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.

REGS A growth strategy with roots back to 1992, now in an ETF wrapper: Columbia splits one large-cap growth mandate across several sleeves instead of betting on a single stock picker, and charges less than the typical active fund hunting the same names.

Stated mandate

FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.

REGS The Columbia large-cap growth strategy seeks long-term capital appreciation. It invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities of large-capitalization companies and is managed through multiple large-cap growth sleeves.

Why people hold it

  • FELG 0.18% a year, roughly a third of the typical fee among active US growth-conviction funds.
  • Not a moonshot: at least 80% of assets sit in Russell 1000 Growth constituents across about 110 stocks, so the manager's bets are tilts around a familiar benchmark.fidelity.com
  • One of the strongest implementations in its peer group, and cheaper than most of the other top-graded names there (GUSE and MAGS at 0.30%, LRGC at 0.39%).
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund from Fidelity with steady on-screen liquidity, and it pays quarterly.
  • REGS 0.35% a year. That is cheap for a stock-picking mandate and sits below the median fee in its active US large-cap growth peer group.
  • Built in sleeves: the mandate runs through multiple large-cap growth teams, so one manager's cold spell does not steer the whole portfolio.
  • At least 80% of assets stay in large-cap equities, with long-term capital appreciation as the stated goal. No style drift into small caps by design.
  • Screens as one of the stronger options in a crowded field of active US growth ETFs, mostly on cost discipline and risk behavior.

Worth knowing

  • FELG Concentrated by design: roughly 110 large-cap growth names, so the megacap tech leaders at the top of the Russell 1000 Growth Index drive the ride both ways.
  • Active means the portfolio deviates from the index on purpose, so results can land on either side of it.
  • Not the cheapest seat in the cohort: JUSA runs 0.12%, though its mandate is broad large-cap rather than the growth slice.
  • REGS Small and thinly traded next to the household-name growth funds. Spreads can be wide, so the price you get depends on how you place the order.
  • Cheaper ways to rent similar exposure exist: JUSA charges 0.12% and FELG 0.18%, both index-anchored enhanced large-cap funds.
  • No declared index behind it. Returns track the managers' picks, which can look nothing like a standard growth benchmark in a given stretch.

Full FELG profile⁠

Full REGS profile⁠

FELG vs REGS Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FELG vs REGS Cost

Overpaying REGS vs FELG

$3,377

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FELG 0.18%

    $3,749

  • REGS 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FELG 0.18%
  • REGS 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530REGS $7,126FELG $3,749

Year by year

YearFELGREGSOverpaying
10$328$634$306
20$1,281$2,454$1,173
30$3,749$7,126$3,377

Expense ratio

  • 0.18%FELG, cheaper
  • 0.35%REGS
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

FELG cheapest of 90 funds

REGS 5th cheapest of 90 funds

FELG vs REGS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FELG 0.37%
REGS No data
Payout (12M)
FELG $0.16
REGS None
Last payment
FELG $0.04
REGS No data
Ex-dividend
FELG Sep 18, 2026
REGS No data
Paid on
FELG Sep 22, 2026
REGS No data
Frequency
FELG Quarterly
REGS No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

FELGQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll FELG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Oct 13, 2023 $0.14; Nov 14, 2023 $0.04; Dec 28, 2023 $0.03; Mar 15, 2024 $0.03; Jun 21, 2024 $0.05; Sep 20, 2024 $0.04; Dec 20, 2024 $0.05; Mar 21, 2025 $0.04; Jun 20, 2025 $0.04; Sep 19, 2025 $0.04; Dec 19, 2025 $0.04; Mar 20, 2026 $0.03; Jun 18, 2026 $0.05; Sep 18, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD
REGSAll REGS payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FELG vs REGS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FELG 16.3%since Dec 2023REGS No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FELG 0.93since Dec 2023REGS No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FELG −23.9%since Nov 2023REGS No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FELG 1.23REGS 1.31

FELG and REGS in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FELGAvsJUSAA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REGSAvsJUSAA

    Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FELGAvsGUSEA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REGSAvsGUSEA

    Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FELGAvsLRGCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REGSAvsLRGCA

    Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.