FELG ranks 4th and REGS 6th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs REGS
FELG −0.17pt a year
0.18%0.35%
FELG 11.0×the volume
379K34.4K
FELG vs REGS Performance
−0.6%−0.7%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- REGS 0.35%
- FELG $5.78B
- REGS $77M
- FELG −0.5%
- REGS
- FELG 0.37%
- REGS
- FELG 133
- REGS 57
- FELG 379K sh, better
- REGS 34.4K sh
- FELG $42.20
- REGS $11.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | REGS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A93 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C51 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | A85Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | C52 | A70Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | B58 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and REGS are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
REGSA
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
REGS A growth strategy with roots back to 1992, now in an ETF wrapper: Columbia splits one large-cap growth mandate across several sleeves instead of betting on a single stock picker, and charges less than the typical active fund hunting the same names.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
REGS The Columbia large-cap growth strategy seeks long-term capital appreciation. It invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities of large-capitalization companies and is managed through multiple large-cap growth sleeves.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs REGS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs REGS Cost
Overpaying REGS vs FELG
$3,377
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
REGS 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | REGS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $634 | $306 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,454 | $1,173 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $7,126 | $3,377 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.35%REGS
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
REGS 5th cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs REGS Dividends
- FELG 0.37%
- REGS
- FELG $0.16
- REGS None
- FELG $0.04
- REGS
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- REGS
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- REGS
- FELG Quarterly
- REGS
Distribution history
FELG vs REGS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%REGS
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93REGS
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%REGS
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23REGS 1.31
FELG and REGS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
