LRGC vs REGS

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

REGSAColumbia Large Cap Growth ETF

In short

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

REGS A growth strategy with roots back to 1992, now in an ETF wrapper: Columbia splits one large-cap growth mandate across several sleeves instead of betting on a single stock picker, and charges less than the typical active fund hunting the same names.

Stated mandate

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

REGS The Columbia large-cap growth strategy seeks long-term capital appreciation. It invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities of large-capitalization companies and is managed through multiple large-cap growth sleeves.

Why people hold it

• LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
• 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
• One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
• Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

• REGS 0.35% a year. That is cheap for a stock-picking mandate and sits below the median fee in its active US large-cap growth peer group.
• Built in sleeves: the mandate runs through multiple large-cap growth teams, so one manager's cold spell does not steer the whole portfolio.
• At least 80% of assets stay in large-cap equities, with long-term capital appreciation as the stated goal. No style drift into small caps by design.
• Screens as one of the stronger options in a crowded field of active US growth ETFs, mostly on cost discipline and risk behavior.

Worth knowing

• LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
• Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
• It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

• REGS Small and thinly traded next to the household-name growth funds. Spreads can be wide, so the price you get depends on how you place the order.
• Cheaper ways to rent similar exposure exist: JUSA charges 0.12% and FELG 0.18%, both index-anchored enhanced large-cap funds.
• No declared index behind it. Returns track the managers' picks, which can look nothing like a standard growth benchmark in a given stretch.

Full LRGC profile⁠

Full REGS profile⁠