Skip to content

JUSA vs REGS

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

JUSAANYSE Arca

Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF

REGSANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

JUSA −0.17pt a year

JUSA0.18%REGS0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

JUSA 2.9×the volume

JUSA98.8KREGS34.4K

JUSA vs REGS Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.5%JUSA−0.7%REGS

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. JUSA +0.5%. REGS −0.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.2%4%6%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
JUSA 0.18%, better
REGS 0.35%
Fund size
JUSA $745M
REGS $77M
1Y total return
JUSA +10.8%
REGS No data
Yield (12M)
JUSA 0.72%
REGS No data
Holdings
JUSA 263
REGS 57
Avg volume (30D)
JUSA 98.8K sh, better
REGS 34.4K sh
NAV per share
JUSA $67.75
REGS $11.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JUSA: Cost 99, Risk 92, Mission 84, Tradability 58, Holdings 84, Durability 76. REGS: Cost 93, Risk 83, Mission not scored, Tradability 40, Holdings 70, Durability 58.
Pillar letters and Scores for JUSA, REGS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJUSAREGS
Cost30% weightA99HigherA93
Mission25% weightA84Not scored
Risk15% weightA92HigherA83
Tradability15% weightB58HigherC40
Holdings10% weightA84HigherA70
Durability5% weightA76HigherB58

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JUSA and REGS are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

JUSA ranks 1st and REGS 6th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 5AGQQQAstoria US Quality Growth Kings ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 6AREGSColumbia Large Cap Growth ETFScore 75
  5. Rank 7ATGRTT. Rowe Price Growth ETFScore 72

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JUSAAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

REGSAColumbia Large Cap Growth ETF

In short

JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.

REGS A growth strategy with roots back to 1992, now in an ETF wrapper: Columbia splits one large-cap growth mandate across several sleeves instead of betting on a single stock picker, and charges less than the typical active fund hunting the same names.

Stated mandate

JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.

REGS The Columbia large-cap growth strategy seeks long-term capital appreciation. It invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities of large-capitalization companies and is managed through multiple large-cap growth sleeves.

Why people hold it

  • JUSA 0.18% a year with no waiver propping it up, below its category median. GUSE charges 0.30% and LRGC 0.39% for similar enhanced-index work; FELG ties it at 0.18%.
  • Active where it counts, plain where it doesn't: bottom-up stock picks across roughly 300 large caps, with sector mix and risk profile kept close to the S&P 500.jpmorgan.com
  • Stands among the strongest implementations in a 90-fund peer group of active large-cap funds, helped by a low fee and tightly managed risk.
  • REGS 0.35% a year. That is cheap for a stock-picking mandate and sits below the median fee in its active US large-cap growth peer group.
  • Built in sleeves: the mandate runs through multiple large-cap growth teams, so one manager's cold spell does not steer the whole portfolio.
  • At least 80% of assets stay in large-cap equities, with long-term capital appreciation as the stated goal. No style drift into small caps by design.
  • Screens as one of the stronger options in a crowded field of active US growth ETFs, mostly on cost discipline and risk behavior.

Worth knowing

  • JUSA Launched in March 2025, so there is only a short live record on this ticker to judge.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can run wider than the giant index funds', especially in fast markets.
  • Tracking the S&P 500's sector weights limits how far results can stray from the benchmark in either direction. This is a nudge on the index, not a different bet.jpmorgan.com
  • REGS Small and thinly traded next to the household-name growth funds. Spreads can be wide, so the price you get depends on how you place the order.
  • Cheaper ways to rent similar exposure exist: JUSA charges 0.12% and FELG 0.18%, both index-anchored enhanced large-cap funds.
  • No declared index behind it. Returns track the managers' picks, which can look nothing like a standard growth benchmark in a given stretch.

Full JUSA profile⁠

Full REGS profile⁠

JUSA vs REGS Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JUSA vs REGS Cost

Overpaying REGS vs JUSA

$3,377

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JUSA 0.18%

    $3,749

  • REGS 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JUSA 0.18%
  • REGS 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530REGS $7,126JUSA $3,749

Year by year

YearJUSAREGSOverpaying
10$328$634$306
20$1,281$2,454$1,173
30$3,749$7,126$3,377

Expense ratio

  • 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
  • 0.35%REGS
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

JUSA cheapest of 90 funds

REGS 5th cheapest of 90 funds

JUSA vs REGS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
JUSA 0.72%
REGS No data
Payout (12M)
JUSA $0.49
REGS None
Last payment
JUSA $0.13
REGS No data
Ex-dividend
JUSA Sep 22, 2026
REGS No data
Paid on
JUSA Sep 24, 2026
REGS No data
Frequency
JUSA Quarterly
REGS No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

JUSAQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll JUSA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2025 $0.11; Sep 23, 2025 $0.15; Dec 16, 2025 $0.18; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.06; Sep 22, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD
REGSAll REGS payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JUSA vs REGS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JUSA 11.6%since Apr 2025REGS No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JUSA 1.41since Apr 2025REGS No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JUSA −14.0%since Mar 2025REGS No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JUSA 0.98REGS 1.31

JUSA and REGS in the news

Popular comparisons

  • JUSAAvsGUSEA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REGSAvsGUSEA

    Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsLRGCA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REGSAvsLRGCA

    Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsFELGA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REGSAvsFELGA

    Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.