JUSA ranks 1st and REGS 6th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JUSA vs REGS
JUSA −0.17pt a year
0.18%0.35%
JUSA 2.9×the volume
98.8K34.4K
JUSA vs REGS Performance
+0.5%−0.7%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- REGS 0.35%
- JUSA $745M
- REGS $77M
- JUSA +10.8%
- REGS
- JUSA 0.72%
- REGS
- JUSA 263
- REGS 57
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- REGS 34.4K sh
- JUSA $67.75
- REGS $11.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUSA | REGS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A93 |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | A92Higher | A83 |
| Tradability | B58Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | A84Higher | A70 |
| Durability | A76Higher | B58 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JUSA and REGS are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUSAA
REGSA
In short
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
REGS A growth strategy with roots back to 1992, now in an ETF wrapper: Columbia splits one large-cap growth mandate across several sleeves instead of betting on a single stock picker, and charges less than the typical active fund hunting the same names.
Stated mandate
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
REGS The Columbia large-cap growth strategy seeks long-term capital appreciation. It invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities of large-capitalization companies and is managed through multiple large-cap growth sleeves.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUSA vs REGS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUSA vs REGS Cost
Overpaying REGS vs JUSA
$3,377
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
REGS 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUSA | REGS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $634 | $306 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,454 | $1,173 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $7,126 | $3,377 |
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- 0.35%REGS
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
REGS 5th cheapest of 90 funds
JUSA vs REGS Dividends
- JUSA 0.72%
- REGS
- JUSA $0.49
- REGS None
- JUSA $0.13
- REGS
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- REGS
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- REGS
- JUSA Quarterly
- REGS
Distribution history
JUSA vs REGS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUSA 11.6%REGS
- Return per unit of risk
- JUSA 1.41REGS
- Worst fall
- JUSA −14.0%REGS
- Market sensitivity
- JUSA 0.98REGS 1.31
JUSA and REGS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

