FELG ranks 4th and TCHP 38th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs TCHP
FELG −0.39pt a year
0.18%0.57%
FELG 2.0×the volume
368K181K
FELG vs TCHP Performance
−0.2%−2.1%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- TCHP 0.57%
- FELG $5.44B
- TCHP $1.99B
- FELG −0.2%, better
- TCHP −2.1%
- FELG 0.38%, better
- TCHP 0.00%
- FELG 137
- TCHP 64
- FELG 368K sh, better
- TCHP 181K sh
- FELG $41.08
- TCHP $46.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | TCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | C47 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C53Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | A71 |
| Holdings | C53Higher | C45 |
| Durability | A95Higher | A87 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and TCHP are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
TCHPC
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
TCHP The ETF wrapper on T. Rowe Price's Blue Chip Growth strategy, run in mutual fund form since 1993. It's also a rarity in today's market: an active fund that doesn't show its cards daily, publishing a proxy portfolio instead of a full holdings list.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
TCHP The fund seeks long-term capital growth, with income as a secondary objective.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs TCHP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs TCHP Cost
Overpaying TCHP vs FELG
$7,522
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
TCHP 0.57%
$11,271
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | TCHP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,023 | $695 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $3,921 | $2,640 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $11,271 | $7,522 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.57%TCHP
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
TCHP 50th cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs TCHP Dividends
- FELG 0.38%, better
- TCHP 0.00%
- FELG $0.16
- TCHP None
- FELG $0.04
- TCHP
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- TCHP
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- TCHP
- FELG Quarterly
- TCHP
Distribution history
FELG vs TCHP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%TCHP 17.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93TCHP 0.96
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%TCHP −42.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.26TCHP 1.21
FELG and TCHP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
