JUSA ranks 1st and TCHP 38th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JUSA vs TCHP
JUSA −0.39pt a year
0.18%0.57%
TCHP 1.6×the volume
112K181K
JUSA vs TCHP Performance
+12.2%−2.1%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- TCHP 0.57%
- JUSA $871M
- TCHP $1.99B
- JUSA +12.2%, better
- TCHP −2.1%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- TCHP 0.00%
- JUSA 264
- TCHP 64
- JUSA 112K sh
- TCHP 181K sh, better
- JUSA $65.95
- TCHP $46.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUSA | TCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | C47 |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | A92Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | B60 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | A83Higher | C45 |
| Durability | A77 | A87Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JUSA and TCHP are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUSAA
TCHPC
In short
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
TCHP The ETF wrapper on T. Rowe Price's Blue Chip Growth strategy, run in mutual fund form since 1993. It's also a rarity in today's market: an active fund that doesn't show its cards daily, publishing a proxy portfolio instead of a full holdings list.
Stated mandate
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
TCHP The fund seeks long-term capital growth, with income as a secondary objective.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUSA vs TCHP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUSA vs TCHP Cost
Overpaying TCHP vs JUSA
$7,522
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
TCHP 0.57%
$11,271
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUSA | TCHP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,023 | $695 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $3,921 | $2,640 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $11,271 | $7,522 |
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- 0.57%TCHP
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
TCHP 50th cheapest of 90 funds
JUSA vs TCHP Dividends
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- TCHP 0.00%
- JUSA $0.49
- TCHP None
- JUSA $0.13
- TCHP
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- TCHP
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- TCHP
- JUSA Quarterly
- TCHP
Distribution history
JUSA vs TCHP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUSA 11.6%TCHP 17.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- JUSA 1.41TCHP 0.96
- Worst fall
- JUSA −14.0%TCHP −42.3%
- Market sensitivity
- JUSA 0.98TCHP 1.21
JUSA and TCHP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

