LRGC ranks 3rd and TCHP 38th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
LRGC vs TCHP
LRGC −0.18pt a year
0.39%0.57%
TCHP 5.3×the volume
34K181K
LRGC +1.3pt
+20.1%+18.8%
LRGC vs TCHP Performance
+11.6%−2.1%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- TCHP 0.57%
- LRGC $1.33B
- TCHP $1.99B
- LRGC +11.6%, better
- TCHP −2.1%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- TCHP 0.00%
- LRGC 73
- TCHP 64
- LRGC 34K sh
- TCHP 181K sh, better
- LRGC $83.23
- TCHP $46.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LRGC | TCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | C47 |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | A92Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | A71 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | C45 |
| Durability | A79 | A87Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. LRGC and TCHP are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LRGCA
TCHPC
In short
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
TCHP The ETF wrapper on T. Rowe Price's Blue Chip Growth strategy, run in mutual fund form since 1993. It's also a rarity in today's market: an active fund that doesn't show its cards daily, publishing a proxy portfolio instead of a full holdings list.
Stated mandate
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
TCHP The fund seeks long-term capital growth, with income as a secondary objective.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LRGC vs TCHP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LRGC vs TCHP Cost
Overpaying TCHP vs LRGC
$3,373
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
TCHP 0.57%
$11,271
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LRGC | TCHP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,023 | $318 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $3,921 | $1,196 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $11,271 | $3,373 |
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- 0.57%TCHP
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
TCHP 50th cheapest of 90 funds
LRGC vs TCHP Dividends
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- TCHP 0.00%
- LRGC $0.45
- TCHP None
- LRGC $0.45
- TCHP
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- TCHP
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- TCHP
- LRGC Annual
- TCHP
Distribution history
LRGC vs TCHP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LRGC 12.7%, betterTCHP 17.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- LRGC 1.26, betterTCHP 0.96
- Worst fall
- LRGC −19.4%TCHP −42.3%
- Market sensitivity
- LRGC 1.00TCHP 1.21
LRGC and TCHP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
