FELG ranks 4th and TLG 64th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs TLG
FELG −0.49pt a year
0.18%0.67%
FELG 20.4×the volume
379K18.6K
FELG vs TLG Performance
−1.8%−6.3%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- TLG 0.67%
- FELG $5.78B
- TLG $108M
- FELG −1.7%
- TLG
- FELG 0.37%
- TLG
- FELG 132
- TLG 34
- FELG 379K sh, better
- TLG 18.6K sh
- FELG $42.20
- TLG $24.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | TLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F23 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C51Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | C52Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A95Higher | B64 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and TLG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
TLGC
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
TLG A 25-to-35 stock growth portfolio run by DSM Capital Partners since 2009, now in an ETF shell. Conviction over coverage: the Russell 1000 Growth Index is the yardstick, not the blueprint.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
TLG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of large-capitalization issuers, using a bottom-up, idea-driven growth approach with a long-term investment horizon.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs TLG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs TLG Cost
Overpaying TLG vs FELG
$9,325
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
TLG 0.67%
$13,074
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | TLG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,198 | $870 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $4,568 | $3,287 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $13,074 | $9,325 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.67%TLG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
TLG 69th cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs TLG Dividends
- FELG 0.37%
- TLG
- FELG $0.16
- TLG None
- FELG $0.04
- TLG
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- TLG
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- TLG
- FELG Quarterly
- TLG
Distribution history
FELG vs TLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%TLG
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93TLG
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%TLG
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23TLG 1.32
FELG and TLG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.67% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.67% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.67% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


