LRGC ranks 3rd and TLG 64th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
LRGC vs TLG
LRGC −0.28pt a year
0.39%0.67%
LRGC 1.8×the volume
34.1K18.6K
LRGC vs TLG Performance
−0.5%−6.3%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- TLG 0.67%
- LRGC $1.35B
- TLG $108M
- LRGC +9.2%
- TLG
- LRGC 0.53%
- TLG
- LRGC 72
- TLG 34
- LRGC 34.1K sh, better
- TLG 18.6K sh
- LRGC $85.00
- TLG $24.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LRGC | TLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | F23 |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | A90Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A75Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A78Higher | B64 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. LRGC and TLG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LRGCA
TLGC
In short
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
TLG A 25-to-35 stock growth portfolio run by DSM Capital Partners since 2009, now in an ETF shell. Conviction over coverage: the Russell 1000 Growth Index is the yardstick, not the blueprint.
Stated mandate
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
TLG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of large-capitalization issuers, using a bottom-up, idea-driven growth approach with a long-term investment horizon.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LRGC vs TLG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LRGC vs TLG Cost
Overpaying TLG vs LRGC
$5,176
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
TLG 0.67%
$13,074
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LRGC | TLG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,198 | $493 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,568 | $1,843 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $13,074 | $5,176 |
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- 0.67%TLG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
TLG 69th cheapest of 90 funds
LRGC vs TLG Dividends
- LRGC 0.53%
- TLG
- LRGC $0.45
- TLG None
- LRGC $0.45
- TLG
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- TLG
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- TLG
- LRGC Annual
- TLG
Distribution history
LRGC vs TLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LRGC 12.7%TLG
- Return per unit of risk
- LRGC 1.26TLG
- Worst fall
- LRGC −19.4%TLG
- Market sensitivity
- LRGC 1.00TLG 1.32
LRGC and TLG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.67% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.67% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.67% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


