GUSE ranks 2nd and TLG 64th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
GUSE vs TLG
GUSE −0.37pt a year
0.30%0.67%
GUSE 1.3×the volume
24.9K18.6K
GUSE vs TLG Performance
0.0%−6.3%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- TLG 0.67%
- GUSE $413M
- TLG $108M
- GUSE 122
- TLG 34
- GUSE 24.9K sh, better
- TLG 18.6K sh
- GUSE $45.25
- TLG $24.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GUSE | TLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F23 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A94Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | C46 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | A89Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A85Higher | B64 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. GUSE and TLG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GUSEA
TLGC
In short
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
TLG A 25-to-35 stock growth portfolio run by DSM Capital Partners since 2009, now in an ETF shell. Conviction over coverage: the Russell 1000 Growth Index is the yardstick, not the blueprint.
Stated mandate
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
TLG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of large-capitalization issuers, using a bottom-up, idea-driven growth approach with a long-term investment horizon.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GUSE vs TLG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GUSE vs TLG Cost
Overpaying TLG vs GUSE
$6,925
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
TLG 0.67%
$13,074
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GUSE | TLG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,198 | $653 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $4,568 | $2,455 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $13,074 | $6,925 |
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- 0.67%TLG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
TLG 69th cheapest of 90 funds
GUSE vs TLG Dividends
- GUSE
- TLG None
- GUSE $0.30
- TLG
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- TLG
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- TLG
- GUSE Irregular
- TLG
Distribution history
GUSE vs TLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- GUSE 0.94TLG 1.32
GUSE and TLG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.67% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.67% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.67% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

