FLCH ranks 1st and KSTR 28th of 28 funds in the China Category.
FLCH vs KSTR
FLCH −0.70pt a year
0.19%0.89%
KSTR 8.2×the volume
108K892K
FLCH +3.1pt
−3.6%−6.7%
FLCH vs KSTR Performance
−16.9%−29.3%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- KSTR 0.89%
- FLCH $252M
- KSTR $259M
- FLCH −20.3%
- KSTR −10.4%, better
- FLCH 2.61%
- KSTR
- FLCH 1112
- KSTR 55
- FLCH 108K sh
- KSTR 892K sh, better
- FLCH $19.38
- KSTR $16.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLCH | KSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F10 |
| Mission | A87Higher | C49 |
| Risk | B64Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | B66Higher | F21 |
| Durability | A70Higher | B64 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. FLCH and KSTR are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLCHA
KSTRD
In short
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
KSTR A concentrated way into Shanghai's Science and Technology Innovation Board: KSTR tracks the STAR 50, roughly 50 A-share tech and chip names, and no other China fund in its peer group follows that benchmark.
Stated mandate
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
KSTR The Fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLCH vs KSTR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLCH vs KSTR Cost
Overpaying KSTR vs FLCH
$12,920
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
KSTR 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLCH | KSTR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $1,576 | $1,229 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $5,953 | $4,602 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $16,872 | $12,920 |
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- 0.89%KSTR
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
KSTR 24th cheapest of 28 funds
FLCH vs KSTR Dividends
- FLCH 2.61%
- KSTR
- FLCH $0.51
- KSTR None
- FLCH $0.14
- KSTR
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- KSTR
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- KSTR
- FLCH Twice a year
- KSTR
Distribution history
FLCH vs KSTR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLCH
- KSTR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLCH 21.1%, betterKSTR 46.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLCH 0.29KSTR 0.35, better
- Worst fall
- FLCH −48.1%, betterKSTR −63.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FLCH 0.55KSTR 0.86
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.