Skip to content

FLCH vs KSTR

Franklin FTSE China ETF

FLCHANYSE Arca

KraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETF

KSTRDNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FLCH −0.70pt a year

FLCH0.19%KSTR0.89%

Avg volume · 30D

KSTR 8.2×the volume

FLCH108KKSTR892K

5Y return · a year

FLCH +3.1pt

FLCH−3.6%KSTR−6.7%

FLCH vs KSTR Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

−16.9%FLCH−29.3%KSTR

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. FLCH −16.9%. KSTR −29.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%0%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FLCH 0.19%, better
KSTR 0.89%
Fund size
FLCH $252M
KSTR $259M
1Y total return
FLCH −20.3%
KSTR −10.4%, better
Yield (12M)
FLCH 2.61%
KSTR No data
Holdings
FLCH 1112
KSTR 55
Avg volume (30D)
FLCH 108K sh
KSTR 892K sh, better
NAV per share
FLCH $19.38
KSTR $16.87
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FLCH: Cost 100, Risk 64, Mission 87, Tradability 64, Holdings 66, Durability 70. KSTR: Cost 10, Risk 29, Mission 49, Tradability 55, Holdings 21, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for FLCH, KSTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFLCHKSTR
Cost30% weightA100HigherF10
Mission25% weightA87HigherC49
Risk15% weightB64HigherD29
Tradability15% weightB64HigherB55
Holdings10% weightB66HigherF21
Durability5% weightA70HigherB64

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FLCH and KSTR are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

FLCH ranks 1st and KSTR 28th of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 1AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 26DKTECKraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETFScore 34
  5. Rank 28DKSTRKraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETFScore 33

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FLCHAFranklin FTSE China ETF

KSTRDKraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETF

In short

FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.

KSTR A concentrated way into Shanghai's Science and Technology Innovation Board: KSTR tracks the STAR 50, roughly 50 A-share tech and chip names, and no other China fund in its peer group follows that benchmark.

Stated mandate

FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.

KSTR The Fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index.

Why people hold it

  • FLCH 0.19% a year, against a roughly 0.70% median for China funds. It also undercuts the category stalwarts MCHI and GXC, both at 0.59%.
  • About 1,000 holdings, so you own the long tail of Chinese listings rather than a short list of mega-cap headline names.
  • One job, done tightly: mirror the FTSE China RIC Capped Index before fees. On tracking it ranks among the strongest builds in its China peer group.sec.gov
  • KSTR Tracks the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index, about 50 Shanghai-listed names. No other China ETF in its peer group follows the same benchmark.
  • Actively traded for a niche single-country fund, so getting in and out tends to be straightforward rather than a spread-hunting exercise.
  • Plain plumbing: a 1940 Act fund following a published index, run since 2021 by a China-focused specialist, with a few hundred million in assets behind it.

Worth knowing

  • FLCH It is China or nothing. Policy shifts, regulatory news and the currency drive the ride, with no other market in the basket to cushion it.
  • Mid-sized and only moderately traded next to the category's giants, so bid-ask spreads can bite more on larger orders.
  • Cash comes once or twice a year, not monthly. This is an equity index vehicle, not an income schedule.
  • KSTR At 0.89% a year, it costs more than the typical China ETF in its group. That is the toll for a board most issuers skip.
  • Roughly 50 stocks from one exchange board, tilted toward semiconductors, so moves land harder than in broad China funds like MCHI or FLCH.
  • Across its China peer group it lands in the bottom quarter on our overall read, weighed down mainly by cost and how narrow the portfolio is.

Full FLCH profile⁠

Full KSTR profile⁠

FLCH vs KSTR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FLCH vs KSTR Cost

Overpaying KSTR vs FLCH

$12,920

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FLCH 0.19%

    $3,952

  • KSTR 0.89%

    $16,872

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FLCH 0.19%
  • KSTR 0.89%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530KSTR $16,872FLCH $3,952

Year by year

YearFLCHKSTROverpaying
10$347$1,576$1,229
20$1,351$5,953$4,602
30$3,952$16,872$12,920

Expense ratio

  • 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
  • 0.89%KSTR
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

FLCH cheapest of 28 funds

KSTR 24th cheapest of 28 funds

FLCH vs KSTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
FLCH 2.61%
KSTR No data
Payout (12M)
FLCH $0.51
KSTR None
Last payment
FLCH $0.14
KSTR No data
Ex-dividend
FLCH Jun 26, 2026
KSTR No data
Paid on
FLCH Jul 6, 2026
KSTR No data
Frequency
FLCH Twice a year
KSTR No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FLCHTwice a year · 18 paymentsAll FLCH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2017 $0.00084; Jun 20, 2018 $0.10; Dec 20, 2018 $0.29; Jun 11, 2019 $0.03; Dec 11, 2019 $0.46; Jun 11, 2020 $0.04; Dec 14, 2020 $0.25; Jun 10, 2021 $0.03; Dec 13, 2021 $0.34; Jun 17, 2022 $0.14; Dec 16, 2022 $0.36; Jun 16, 2023 $0.19; Dec 15, 2023 $0.37; Jun 21, 2024 $0.12; Dec 20, 2024 $0.41; Jun 20, 2025 $0.19; Dec 19, 2025 $0.37; Jun 26, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
KSTRAll KSTR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FLCH vs KSTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FLCH
  • KSTR
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: KSTR −63.8% · Sep 2024. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FLCH 21.1%, betterKSTR 46.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FLCH 0.29KSTR 0.35, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FLCH −48.1%, betterKSTR −63.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FLCH 0.55KSTR 0.86

Popular comparisons

  • FLCHAvsCXSEA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KSTRDvsCXSEA

    KraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsMCHIA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KSTRDvsMCHIA

    KraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsGXCA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KSTRDvsGXCA

    KraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.