MCHI ranks 3rd and KSTR 28th of 28 funds in the China Category.
KSTR vs MCHI
MCHI −0.30pt a year
0.89%0.59%
MCHI 2.5×the volume
892K2.24M
MCHI +2.7pt
−6.7%−4.0%
KSTR vs MCHI Performance
−29.3%−18.7%
- KSTR 0.89%
- MCHI 0.59%, better
- KSTR $259M
- MCHI $5.49B
- KSTR −10.4%, better
- MCHI −20.5%
- KSTR
- MCHI 2.21%
- KSTR 55
- MCHI 581
- KSTR 892K sh
- MCHI 2.24M sh, better
- KSTR $16.87
- MCHI $48.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KSTR | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A78Higher |
| Mission | C49 | A87Higher |
| Risk | D29 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | F21 | B57Higher |
| Durability | B64 | A91Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. KSTR and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KSTRD
MCHIA
In short
KSTR A concentrated way into Shanghai's Science and Technology Innovation Board: KSTR tracks the STAR 50, roughly 50 A-share tech and chip names, and no other China fund in its peer group follows that benchmark.
MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.
Stated mandate
KSTR The Fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index.
MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KSTR vs MCHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KSTR vs MCHI Cost
Overpaying KSTR vs MCHI
$5,237
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KSTR 0.89%
$16,872
MCHI 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KSTR | MCHI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,058 | $518 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $4,051 | $1,902 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $11,635 | $5,237 |
- 0.89%KSTR
- 0.59%MCHI, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds
KSTR 24th cheapest of 28 funds
KSTR vs MCHI Dividends
- KSTR
- MCHI 2.21%
- KSTR None
- MCHI $1.10
- KSTR
- MCHI $0.36
- KSTR
- MCHI Jun 15, 2026
- KSTR
- MCHI Jun 18, 2026
- KSTR
- MCHI Twice a year
Distribution history
KSTR vs MCHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KSTR
- MCHI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KSTR 46.0%MCHI 21.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- KSTR 0.35, betterMCHI 0.26
- Worst fall
- KSTR −63.8%MCHI −49.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- KSTR 0.86MCHI 0.63
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





