Skip to content

KSTR vs MCHI

KraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETF

KSTRDNYSE Arca

iShares MSCI China ETF

MCHIANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

MCHI −0.30pt a year

KSTR0.89%MCHI0.59%

Avg volume · 30D

MCHI 2.5×the volume

KSTR892KMCHI2.24M

5Y return · a year

MCHI +2.7pt

KSTR−6.7%MCHI−4.0%

KSTR vs MCHI Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

−29.3%KSTR−18.7%MCHI

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. KSTR −29.3%. MCHI −18.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%0%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
KSTR 0.89%
MCHI 0.59%, better
Fund size
KSTR $259M
MCHI $5.49B
1Y total return
KSTR −10.4%, better
MCHI −20.5%
Yield (12M)
KSTR No data
MCHI 2.21%
Holdings
KSTR 55
MCHI 581
Avg volume (30D)
KSTR 892K sh
MCHI 2.24M sh, better
NAV per share
KSTR $16.87
MCHI $48.89
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KSTR: Cost 10, Risk 29, Mission 49, Tradability 55, Holdings 21, Durability 64. MCHI: Cost 78, Risk 63, Mission 87, Tradability 88, Holdings 57, Durability 91.
Pillar letters and Scores for KSTR, MCHI, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKSTRMCHI
Cost30% weightF10A78Higher
Mission25% weightC49A87Higher
Risk15% weightD29B63Higher
Tradability15% weightB55A88Higher
Holdings10% weightF21B57Higher
Durability5% weightB64A91Higher

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KSTR and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

MCHI ranks 3rd and KSTR 28th of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 1AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 4AGXCState Street SPDR S&P China ETFScore 76
  5. Rank 26DKTECKraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETFScore 34
  6. Rank 28DKSTRKraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETFScore 33

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KSTRDKraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETF

MCHIAiShares MSCI China ETF

In short

KSTR A concentrated way into Shanghai's Science and Technology Innovation Board: KSTR tracks the STAR 50, roughly 50 A-share tech and chip names, and no other China fund in its peer group follows that benchmark.

MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.

Stated mandate

KSTR The Fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index.

MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.

Why people hold it

  • KSTR Tracks the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index, about 50 Shanghai-listed names. No other China ETF in its peer group follows the same benchmark.
  • Actively traded for a niche single-country fund, so getting in and out tends to be straightforward rather than a spread-hunting exercise.
  • Plain plumbing: a 1940 Act fund following a published index, run since 2021 by a China-focused specialist, with a few hundred million in assets behind it.
  • MCHI One ticker, roughly 600 Chinese stocks. Instead of picking among share classes and listings, you get the MSCI China Index (Net) in a single line item.ishares.com
  • 0.59% expense ratio, below the middle of the single-country China pack, and the fund has hewed closely to its stated index mandate.
  • Running since 2011 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, which is why it turns up as the reference China holding in so many portfolios.
  • One of the stronger implementations in its peer group on tradability and staying power, both scored in the top tier of the China cohort.

Worth knowing

  • KSTR At 0.89% a year, it costs more than the typical China ETF in its group. That is the toll for a board most issuers skip.
  • Roughly 50 stocks from one exchange board, tilted toward semiconductors, so moves land harder than in broad China funds like MCHI or FLCH.
  • Across its China peer group it lands in the bottom quarter on our overall read, weighed down mainly by cost and how narrow the portfolio is.
  • MCHI Cheaper broad-China options exist: FLCH charges 0.19% and JPMorgan's active JCHI 0.15%. You are paying up for MCHI's depth and liquidity.
  • Single-country equity risk, undiluted. Chinese regulation, currency and policy swings hit the whole basket at once, and the index leans heavily on its biggest names.
  • Distributions come once or twice a year, not monthly, so cash flow arrives in lumps.

Full KSTR profile⁠

Full MCHI profile⁠

KSTR vs MCHI Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KSTR vs MCHI Cost

Overpaying KSTR vs MCHI

$5,237

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KSTR 0.89%

    $16,872

  • MCHI 0.59%

    $11,635

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KSTR 0.89%
  • MCHI 0.59%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530KSTR $16,872MCHI $11,635

Year by year

YearKSTRMCHIOverpaying
10$1,576$1,058$518
20$5,953$4,051$1,902
30$16,872$11,635$5,237

Expense ratio

  • 0.89%KSTR
  • 0.59%MCHI, cheaper
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds

KSTR 24th cheapest of 28 funds

KSTR vs MCHI Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
KSTR No data
MCHI 2.21%
Payout (12M)
KSTR None
MCHI $1.10
Last payment
KSTR No data
MCHI $0.36
Ex-dividend
KSTR No data
MCHI Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
KSTR No data
MCHI Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
KSTR No data
MCHI Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

KSTRAll KSTR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MCHITwice a year · 19 paymentsAll MCHI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.19; Dec 19, 2017 $0.85; Jun 19, 2018 $0.32; Dec 18, 2018 $0.53; Jun 17, 2019 $0.36; Dec 16, 2019 $0.57; Jun 15, 2020 $0.24; Dec 14, 2020 $0.60; Jun 10, 2021 $0.18; Dec 13, 2021 $0.48; Jun 9, 2022 $0.31; Dec 13, 2022 $0.71; Jun 7, 2023 $0.43; Dec 20, 2023 $0.99; Jun 11, 2024 $0.19; Dec 17, 2024 $0.89; Jun 16, 2025 $0.54; Dec 16, 2025 $0.74; Jun 15, 2026 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

KSTR vs MCHI Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • KSTR
  • MCHI
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: KSTR −63.8% · Sep 2024. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KSTR 46.0%MCHI 21.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KSTR 0.35, betterMCHI 0.26
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KSTR −63.8%MCHI −49.2%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KSTR 0.86MCHI 0.63

Popular comparisons

  • KSTRDvsCXSEA

    KraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHIAvsCXSEA

    iShares MSCI China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KSTRDvsFLCHA

    KraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETF · Franklin FTSE China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHIAvsFLCHA

    iShares MSCI China ETF · Franklin FTSE China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KSTRDvsGXCA

    KraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHIAvsGXCA

    iShares MSCI China ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.