CXSE ranks 1st and KSTR 28th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CXSE vs KSTR
CXSE −0.57pt a year
0.32%0.89%
KSTR 24.0×the volume
37.2K892K
KSTR +2.3pt
−9.0%−6.7%
CXSE vs KSTR Performance
−37.6%−29.3%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- KSTR 0.89%
- CXSE $372M
- KSTR $259M
- CXSE −24.1%
- KSTR −10.4%, better
- CXSE 2.20%
- KSTR
- CXSE 241
- KSTR 55
- CXSE 37.2K sh
- KSTR 892K sh, better
- CXSE $31.37
- KSTR $16.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CXSE | KSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F10 |
| Mission | A100Higher | C49 |
| Risk | C48Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | B63Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | F21 |
| Durability | A79Higher | B64 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CXSE and KSTR are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CXSEA
KSTRD
In short
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
KSTR A concentrated way into Shanghai's Science and Technology Innovation Board: KSTR tracks the STAR 50, roughly 50 A-share tech and chip names, and no other China fund in its peer group follows that benchmark.
Stated mandate
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
KSTR The Fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CXSE vs KSTR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CXSE vs KSTR Cost
Overpaying KSTR vs CXSE
$10,330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
KSTR 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CXSE | KSTR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $1,576 | $996 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $5,953 | $3,703 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $16,872 | $10,330 |
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- 0.89%KSTR
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
KSTR 24th cheapest of 28 funds
CXSE vs KSTR Dividends
- CXSE 2.20%
- KSTR
- CXSE $0.69
- KSTR None
- CXSE $0.26
- KSTR
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- KSTR
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- KSTR
- CXSE Quarterly
- KSTR
Distribution history
CXSE vs KSTR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CXSE
- KSTR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CXSE 24.9%, betterKSTR 46.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- CXSE 0.12KSTR 0.35, better
- Worst fall
- CXSE −57.6%, betterKSTR −63.8%
- Market sensitivity
- CXSE 0.75KSTR 0.86
Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.