GXC ranks 4th and KSTR 28th of 28 funds in the China Category.
GXC vs KSTR
GXC −0.30pt a year
0.59%0.89%
KSTR 38.1×the volume
23.4K892K
GXC +3.2pt
−3.5%−6.7%
GXC vs KSTR Performance
−16.4%−29.3%
- GXC 0.59%, better
- KSTR 0.89%
- GXC $421M
- KSTR $259M
- GXC −18.4%
- KSTR −10.4%, better
- GXC 2.44%
- KSTR
- GXC 1539
- KSTR 55
- GXC 23.4K sh
- KSTR 892K sh, better
- GXC $80.17
- KSTR $16.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GXC | KSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | F10 |
| Mission | A85Higher | C49 |
| Risk | B68Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | F21 |
| Durability | A84Higher | B64 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. GXC and KSTR are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GXCA
KSTRD
In short
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
KSTR A concentrated way into Shanghai's Science and Technology Innovation Board: KSTR tracks the STAR 50, roughly 50 A-share tech and chip names, and no other China fund in its peer group follows that benchmark.
Stated mandate
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
KSTR The Fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GXC vs KSTR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GXC vs KSTR Cost
Overpaying KSTR vs GXC
$5,237
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
KSTR 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GXC | KSTR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,576 | $518 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $5,953 | $1,902 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $16,872 | $5,237 |
- 0.59%GXC, cheaper
- 0.89%KSTR
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
KSTR 24th cheapest of 28 funds
GXC vs KSTR Dividends
- GXC 2.44%
- KSTR
- GXC $1.99
- KSTR None
- GXC $0.67
- KSTR
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- KSTR
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- KSTR
- GXC Twice a year
- KSTR
Distribution history
GXC vs KSTR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GXC
- KSTR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GXC 20.7%, betterKSTR 46.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GXC 0.27KSTR 0.35, better
- Worst fall
- GXC −46.5%, betterKSTR −63.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GXC 0.69KSTR 0.86
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.