FLCH ranks 2nd and KTEC 26th of 28 funds in the China Category.
FLCH vs KTEC
FLCH −0.50pt a year
0.19%0.69%
FLCH 1.5×the volume
108K73.4K
FLCH +6.2pt
−4.1%−10.3%
FLCH vs KTEC Performance
−18.7%−42.1%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- KTEC 0.69%
- FLCH $252M
- KTEC $44M
- FLCH −20.9%, better
- KTEC −37.2%
- FLCH 2.63%
- KTEC 4.91%, better
- FLCH 1112
- KTEC 30
- FLCH 108K sh, better
- KTEC 73.4K sh
- FLCH $19.38
- KTEC $10.66
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLCH | KTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | B64Higher | F17 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | B65Higher | F24 |
| Durability | A70Higher | C52 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. FLCH and KTEC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLCHA
KTECD
In short
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
KTEC KTEC buys the Hang Seng TECH Index: the 30 largest technology companies listed in Hong Kong, wrapped in one US-listed ticker. A narrow, high-conviction slice of Chinese tech rather than a diversified core holding.
Stated mandate
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
KTEC KTEC seeks to track the Hang Seng TECH Index, representing the 30 largest companies in Hong Kong's technology sector.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLCH vs KTEC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLCH vs KTEC Cost
Overpaying KTEC vs FLCH
$9,477
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
KTEC 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLCH | KTEC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $1,232 | $885 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $4,697 | $3,346 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $13,429 | $9,477 |
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- 0.69%KTEC
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
KTEC 17th cheapest of 28 funds
FLCH vs KTEC Dividends
- FLCH 2.63%
- KTEC 4.91%, better
- FLCH $0.51
- KTEC $0.53
- FLCH $0.14
- KTEC $0.53
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- KTEC Dec 22, 2025
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- KTEC Dec 23, 2025
- FLCH Twice a year
- KTEC Annual
Distribution history
FLCH vs KTEC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLCH
- KTEC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLCH 21.1%, betterKTEC 30.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLCH 0.29, betterKTEC −0.03
- Worst fall
- FLCH −48.1%, betterKTEC −57.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FLCH 0.55KTEC 0.79
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.