GXC ranks 4th and KTEC 26th of 28 funds in the China Category.
GXC vs KTEC
GXC −0.10pt a year
0.59%0.69%
KTEC 3.1×the volume
23.4K73.4K
GXC +6.5pt
−3.5%−10.0%
GXC vs KTEC Performance
−16.4%−40.8%
- GXC 0.59%, better
- KTEC 0.69%
- GXC $421M
- KTEC $45M
- GXC −18.4%, better
- KTEC −35.5%
- GXC 2.44%
- KTEC 4.78%, better
- GXC 1539
- KTEC 30
- GXC 23.4K sh
- KTEC 73.4K sh, better
- GXC $80.17
- KTEC $10.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GXC | KTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B68Higher | F17 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | F24 |
| Durability | A84Higher | C52 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. GXC and KTEC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GXCA
KTECD
In short
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
KTEC KTEC buys the Hang Seng TECH Index: the 30 largest technology companies listed in Hong Kong, wrapped in one US-listed ticker. A narrow, high-conviction slice of Chinese tech rather than a diversified core holding.
Stated mandate
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
KTEC KTEC seeks to track the Hang Seng TECH Index, representing the 30 largest companies in Hong Kong's technology sector.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GXC vs KTEC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GXC vs KTEC Cost
Overpaying KTEC vs GXC
$1,794
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
KTEC 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GXC | KTEC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,232 | $174 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $4,697 | $646 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $13,429 | $1,794 |
- 0.59%GXC, cheaper
- 0.69%KTEC
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
KTEC 17th cheapest of 28 funds
GXC vs KTEC Dividends
- GXC 2.44%
- KTEC 4.78%, better
- GXC $1.99
- KTEC $0.53
- GXC $0.67
- KTEC $0.53
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- KTEC Dec 22, 2025
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- KTEC Dec 23, 2025
- GXC Twice a year
- KTEC Annual
Distribution history
GXC vs KTEC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GXC
- KTEC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GXC 20.7%, betterKTEC 30.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- GXC 0.27, betterKTEC −0.03
- Worst fall
- GXC −46.5%, betterKTEC −57.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GXC 0.69KTEC 0.66
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.