MCHI ranks 3rd and KTEC 26th of 28 funds in the China Category.
KTEC vs MCHI
MCHI −0.10pt a year
0.69%0.59%
MCHI 30.5×the volume
73.4K2.24M
MCHI +6.0pt
−10.0%−4.0%
KTEC vs MCHI Performance
−40.8%−18.7%
- KTEC 0.69%
- MCHI 0.59%, better
- KTEC $45M
- MCHI $5.49B
- KTEC −35.5%
- MCHI −20.5%, better
- KTEC 4.78%, better
- MCHI 2.21%
- KTEC 30
- MCHI 581
- KTEC 73.4K sh
- MCHI 2.24M sh, better
- KTEC $10.91
- MCHI $48.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KTEC | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | F17 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | F24 | B57Higher |
| Durability | C52 | A91Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. KTEC and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KTECD
MCHIA
In short
KTEC KTEC buys the Hang Seng TECH Index: the 30 largest technology companies listed in Hong Kong, wrapped in one US-listed ticker. A narrow, high-conviction slice of Chinese tech rather than a diversified core holding.
MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.
Stated mandate
KTEC KTEC seeks to track the Hang Seng TECH Index, representing the 30 largest companies in Hong Kong's technology sector.
MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KTEC vs MCHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KTEC vs MCHI Cost
Overpaying KTEC vs MCHI
$1,794
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KTEC 0.69%
$13,429
MCHI 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KTEC | MCHI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,058 | $174 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $4,051 | $646 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $11,635 | $1,794 |
- 0.69%KTEC
- 0.59%MCHI, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds
KTEC 17th cheapest of 28 funds
KTEC vs MCHI Dividends
- KTEC 4.78%, better
- MCHI 2.21%
- KTEC $0.53
- MCHI $1.10
- KTEC $0.53
- MCHI $0.36
- KTEC Dec 22, 2025
- MCHI Jun 15, 2026
- KTEC Dec 23, 2025
- MCHI Jun 18, 2026
- KTEC Annual
- MCHI Twice a year
Distribution history
KTEC vs MCHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KTEC
- MCHI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KTEC 30.1%MCHI 21.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- KTEC −0.03MCHI 0.26, better
- Worst fall
- KTEC −57.9%MCHI −49.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- KTEC 0.66MCHI 0.63
KTEC and MCHI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





