CXSE ranks 1st and KTEC 26th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CXSE vs KTEC
CXSE −0.37pt a year
0.32%0.69%
KTEC 2.0×the volume
37.2K73.4K
CXSE +1.0pt
−9.0%−10.0%
CXSE vs KTEC Performance
−37.6%−40.8%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- KTEC 0.69%
- CXSE $372M
- KTEC $45M
- CXSE −24.1%, better
- KTEC −35.5%
- CXSE 2.20%
- KTEC 4.78%, better
- CXSE 241
- KTEC 30
- CXSE 37.2K sh
- KTEC 73.4K sh, better
- CXSE $31.37
- KTEC $10.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CXSE | KTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C48Higher | F17 |
| Tradability | B63Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | F24 |
| Durability | A79Higher | C52 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CXSE and KTEC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CXSEA
KTECD
In short
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
KTEC KTEC buys the Hang Seng TECH Index: the 30 largest technology companies listed in Hong Kong, wrapped in one US-listed ticker. A narrow, high-conviction slice of Chinese tech rather than a diversified core holding.
Stated mandate
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
KTEC KTEC seeks to track the Hang Seng TECH Index, representing the 30 largest companies in Hong Kong's technology sector.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CXSE vs KTEC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CXSE vs KTEC Cost
Overpaying KTEC vs CXSE
$6,887
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
KTEC 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CXSE | KTEC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $1,232 | $652 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $4,697 | $2,447 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $13,429 | $6,887 |
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- 0.69%KTEC
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
KTEC 17th cheapest of 28 funds
CXSE vs KTEC Dividends
- CXSE 2.20%
- KTEC 4.78%, better
- CXSE $0.69
- KTEC $0.53
- CXSE $0.26
- KTEC $0.53
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- KTEC Dec 22, 2025
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- KTEC Dec 23, 2025
- CXSE Quarterly
- KTEC Annual
Distribution history
CXSE vs KTEC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CXSE
- KTEC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CXSE 24.9%, betterKTEC 30.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CXSE 0.12, betterKTEC −0.03
- Worst fall
- CXSE −57.6%, betterKTEC −57.9%
- Market sensitivity
- CXSE 0.75KTEC 0.66
Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.