FLKR ranks 15th and IZRL 29th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
FLKR vs IZRL
FLKR −0.40pt a year
0.09%0.49%
FLKR 92.4×the volume
830K8.98K
FLKR +18.1pt
+16.1%−2.0%
FLKR vs IZRL Performance
+110.9%−9.7%
- FLKR 0.09%, better
- IZRL 0.49%
- FLKR $1.79B
- IZRL $134M
- FLKR +62.5%, better
- IZRL −4.5%
- FLKR 2.92%, better
- IZRL 2.88%
- FLKR 148
- IZRL 66
- FLKR 830K sh, better
- IZRL 8.98K sh
- FLKR $51.47
- IZRL $27.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLKR | IZRL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | B55 |
| Mission | B57Higher | C41 |
| Risk | D25Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | C49Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | C50 | A70Higher |
| Durability | B60Higher | D38 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. FLKR and IZRL are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLKRB
IZRLC
In short
FLKR Korea in one passive basket for 0.09% a year, a fraction of the 0.50% typical single-country fee. Roughly 160 Korean names tracking a capped FTSE index, run as plain index plumbing rather than a stock-picking bet.
IZRL ARK's odd one out. Instead of Cathie Wood's team picking stocks, IZRL follows a rules-based index of Israeli-incorporated innovators, equally weighted so the small names carry the same load as the household ones.
Stated mandate
FLKR The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek returns that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index.
IZRL IZRL seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the ARK Israeli Innovation Index. The index targets exchange-listed Israeli companies whose operations pursue disruptive innovation across genomics, health care, biotechnology, industrials, manufacturing, the Internet, and information technology.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLKR vs IZRL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLKR vs IZRL Cost
Overpaying IZRL vs FLKR
$7,894
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLKR 0.09%
$1,898
IZRL 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLKR | IZRL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $883 | $718 |
| 20 | $646 | $3,394 | $2,748 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $9,792 | $7,894 |
- 0.09%FLKR, cheaper
- 0.49%IZRL
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLKR cheapest of 38 funds
IZRL 10th cheapest of 38 funds
FLKR vs IZRL Dividends
- FLKR 2.92%, better
- IZRL 2.88%
- FLKR $1.47
- IZRL $0.78
- FLKR $0.30
- IZRL $0.78
- FLKR Jun 26, 2026
- IZRL Dec 26, 2025
- FLKR Jul 6, 2026
- IZRL Dec 29, 2025
- FLKR Twice a year
- IZRL Annual
Distribution history
FLKR vs IZRL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLKR
- IZRL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLKR 43.0%IZRL 20.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLKR 0.97, betterIZRL 0.80
- Worst fall
- FLKR −41.3%, betterIZRL −52.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FLKR 2.57IZRL 0.91
FLKR and IZRL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





