GUSE ranks 2nd and FMAG 35th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FMAG vs GUSE
GUSE −0.27pt a year
0.57%0.30%
GUSE 1.4×the volume
18.1K24.9K
FMAG vs GUSE Performance
+0.3%+11.8%
- FMAG 0.57%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- FMAG $243M
- GUSE $421M
- FMAG −2.6%
- GUSE
- FMAG 0.00%
- GUSE
- FMAG 51
- GUSE 122
- FMAG 18.1K sh
- GUSE 24.9K sh, better
- FMAG $34.21
- GUSE $46.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMAG | GUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A97Higher |
| Mission | C50 | |
| Risk | B65 | A94Higher |
| Tradability | C47Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A72 | A89Higher |
| Durability | A75 | A85Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FMAG and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMAGB
GUSEA
In short
FMAG Fidelity put the Magellan name on an ETF in 2021: an actively run book of US large-cap growth, cyclical movers alongside steadier names tied to long-term megatrends, measured against the S&P 500.
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
Stated mandate
FMAG The fund seeks capital appreciation through a diversified U.S. equity strategy focused on large-cap growth, including cyclical growth stocks and steady growers positioned for long-term megatrends.
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMAG vs GUSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMAG vs GUSE Cost
Overpaying FMAG vs GUSE
$5,122
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMAG 0.57%
$11,271
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMAG | GUSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,023 | $545 | $478 |
| 20 | $3,921 | $2,113 | $1,808 |
| 30 | $11,271 | $6,149 | $5,122 |
- 0.57%FMAG
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
FMAG 50th cheapest of 90 funds
FMAG vs GUSE Dividends
- FMAG 0.00%
- GUSE
- FMAG $0.001
- GUSE
- FMAG $0.001
- GUSE $0.30
- FMAG Sep 18, 2026
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- FMAG Sep 22, 2026
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- FMAG Annual
- GUSE Irregular
Distribution history
FMAG vs GUSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMAG 15.6%GUSE
- Return per unit of risk
- FMAG 0.86GUSE
- Worst fall
- FMAG −32.9%GUSE
- Market sensitivity
- FMAG 1.11GUSE 0.93
Popular comparisons
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.