JUSA ranks 1st and FMAG 35th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FMAG vs JUSA
JUSA −0.39pt a year
0.57%0.18%
JUSA 5.5×the volume
18.1K98.8K
FMAG vs JUSA Performance
−2.6%+10.8%
- FMAG 0.57%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- FMAG $243M
- JUSA $745M
- FMAG −2.6%
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- FMAG 0.00%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- FMAG 51
- JUSA 263
- FMAG 18.1K sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- FMAG $34.21
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMAG | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A99Higher |
| Mission | C50 | A84Higher |
| Risk | B65 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | A84Higher |
| Durability | A75 | A76Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FMAG and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMAGB
JUSAA
In short
FMAG Fidelity put the Magellan name on an ETF in 2021: an actively run book of US large-cap growth, cyclical movers alongside steadier names tied to long-term megatrends, measured against the S&P 500.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
FMAG The fund seeks capital appreciation through a diversified U.S. equity strategy focused on large-cap growth, including cyclical growth stocks and steady growers positioned for long-term megatrends.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMAG vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMAG vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying FMAG vs JUSA
$7,522
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMAG 0.57%
$11,271
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMAG | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,023 | $328 | $695 |
| 20 | $3,921 | $1,281 | $2,640 |
| 30 | $11,271 | $3,749 | $7,522 |
- 0.57%FMAG
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
FMAG 50th cheapest of 90 funds
FMAG vs JUSA Dividends
- FMAG 0.00%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- FMAG $0.001
- JUSA $0.49
- FMAG $0.001
- JUSA $0.13
- FMAG Sep 18, 2026
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- FMAG Sep 22, 2026
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- FMAG Annual
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
FMAG vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMAG 15.6%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FMAG 0.86JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- FMAG −32.9%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FMAG 1.11JUSA 0.98
FMAG and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.57% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

