LRGC ranks 3rd and FMAG 35th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FMAG vs LRGC
LRGC −0.18pt a year
0.57%0.39%
LRGC 1.9×the volume
18.1K34.1K
LRGC +3.5pt
+18.0%+21.5%
FMAG vs LRGC Performance
−2.6%+9.5%
- FMAG 0.57%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- FMAG $243M
- LRGC $1.37B
- FMAG −2.6%
- LRGC +9.5%, better
- FMAG 0.00%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- FMAG 51
- LRGC 72
- FMAG 18.1K sh
- LRGC 34.1K sh, better
- FMAG $34.21
- LRGC $85.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMAG | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A82Higher |
| Mission | C50 | A79Higher |
| Risk | B65 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | A77Higher |
| Durability | A75 | A78Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FMAG and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMAGB
LRGCA
In short
FMAG Fidelity put the Magellan name on an ETF in 2021: an actively run book of US large-cap growth, cyclical movers alongside steadier names tied to long-term megatrends, measured against the S&P 500.
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
FMAG The fund seeks capital appreciation through a diversified U.S. equity strategy focused on large-cap growth, including cyclical growth stocks and steady growers positioned for long-term megatrends.
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMAG vs LRGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMAG vs LRGC Cost
Overpaying FMAG vs LRGC
$3,373
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMAG 0.57%
$11,271
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMAG | LRGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,023 | $705 | $318 |
| 20 | $3,921 | $2,725 | $1,196 |
| 30 | $11,271 | $7,898 | $3,373 |
- 0.57%FMAG
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
FMAG 50th cheapest of 90 funds
FMAG vs LRGC Dividends
- FMAG 0.00%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- FMAG $0.001
- LRGC $0.45
- FMAG $0.001
- LRGC $0.45
- FMAG Sep 18, 2026
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- FMAG Sep 22, 2026
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- FMAG Annual
- LRGC Annual
Distribution history
FMAG vs LRGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMAG 15.6%LRGC 12.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FMAG 0.86LRGC 1.26, better
- Worst fall
- FMAG −32.9%LRGC −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FMAG 1.11LRGC 1.00
FMAG and LRGC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
