FMAT ranks 2nd and WOOD 12th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.
FMAT vs WOOD
FMAT −0.31pt a year
0.08%0.39%
FMAT 2.5×the volume
57.1K23.2K
FMAT +5.6pt
+10.1%+4.5%
FMAT vs WOOD Performance
+34.2%−14.8%
- FMAT 0.08%, better
- WOOD 0.39%
- FMAT $574M
- WOOD $247M
- FMAT +18.7%, better
- WOOD −3.7%
- FMAT 1.40%
- WOOD 2.58%, better
- FMAT 107
- WOOD 39
- FMAT 57.1K sh, better
- WOOD 23.2K sh
- FMAT $58.45
- WOOD $65.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMAT | WOOD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | D31 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B57Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | B55Higher | D28 |
| Holdings | C48Higher | C42 |
| Durability | C52 | C54Higher |
Rank among Materials (Broad) funds
Same Category. FMAT and WOOD are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMATA
WOODD
In short
FMAT The whole US materials sector in one cheap wrapper: chemicals, industrial gases, miners and packagers, roughly 120 names spanning large down to small caps, for 0.08% a year. Fidelity has run it since 2013.
WOOD Wood is a commodity you can only really own through companies: timberland REITs, Brazilian pulp, Nordic paper, packaging. WOOD packs roughly 25 of them into one ticker and has been doing it since 2008.
Stated mandate
FMAT The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index.
WOOD WOOD is designed to follow an index of worldwide stocks involved in or connected with timber and forestry, giving investors targeted exposure to forest products, packaging, and paper businesses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMAT vs WOOD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMAT vs WOOD Cost
Overpaying WOOD vs FMAT
$6,125
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMAT 0.084%
$1,773
WOOD 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMAT | WOOD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $705 | $551 |
| 20 | $603 | $2,725 | $2,122 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $7,898 | $6,125 |
- 0.08%FMAT, cheaper
- 0.39%WOOD
- Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
FMAT 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
WOOD 9th cheapest of 14 funds
FMAT vs WOOD Dividends
- FMAT 1.40%
- WOOD 2.58%, better
- FMAT $0.82
- WOOD $1.68
- FMAT $0.20
- WOOD $0.63
- FMAT Sep 18, 2026
- WOOD Jun 15, 2026
- FMAT Sep 22, 2026
- WOOD Jun 18, 2026
- FMAT Quarterly
- WOOD Twice a year
Distribution history
FMAT vs WOOD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FMAT
- WOOD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMAT 17.3%WOOD 17.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FMAT 0.54, betterWOOD −0.23
- Worst fall
- FMAT −25.4%, betterWOOD −30.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FMAT 0.98WOOD 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.