SETM ranks 4th and FMTL 5th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
FMTL vs SETM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.65%0.65%
SETM 26.5×the volume
5.93K157K
FMTL vs SETM Performance
+8.5%−15.7%
- FMTL 0.65%
- SETM 0.65%
- FMTL $28M
- SETM $418M
- FMTL
- SETM −8.3%
- FMTL
- SETM 1.85%
- FMTL 51
- SETM 157
- FMTL 5.93K sh
- SETM 157K sh, better
- FMTL $31.04
- SETM $24.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMTL | SETM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | D38 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A87Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | B61 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | A80Higher |
| Durability | C47 | B64Higher |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. FMTL and SETM are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMTLC
SETMC
In short
FMTL First Trust's late-2025 entry into the critical-metals race: an index fund on the miners and processors behind batteries, magnets and grids, across US, developed and emerging markets. Priced at the category median, on a crowded shelf.
SETM Most funds in this corner pick a lane: lithium, or rare earths. SETM tracks an index built to span the wider critical-materials complex, roughly 160 miners and processors in a single basket.
Stated mandate
FMTL The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the Indxx Global Critical Metals Index and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in securities comprising that index.
SETM SETM seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total-return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMTL vs SETM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMTL vs SETM Cost
Same expense ratio
$12,717
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMTL 0.65%
$12,717
SETM 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMTL | SETM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,163 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $4,440 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $12,717 |
- 0.65%FMTL
- 0.65%SETM
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
FMTL 7th cheapest of 12 funds
SETM 7th cheapest of 12 funds
FMTL vs SETM Dividends
- FMTL
- SETM 1.85%
- FMTL
- SETM $0.45
- FMTL $0.51
- SETM $0.45
- FMTL Jun 25, 2026
- SETM Dec 18, 2025
- FMTL Jun 30, 2026
- SETM Dec 22, 2025
- FMTL Twice a year
- SETM Annual
Distribution history
FMTL vs SETM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMTL SETM 36.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- FMTL SETM 0.49
- Worst fall
- FMTL SETM −42.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FMTL 0.98SETM 1.33
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


