ILIT ranks 2nd and SETM 4th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
ILIT vs SETM
ILIT −0.18pt a year
0.47%0.65%
SETM 13.0×the volume
12.1K157K
SETM +28.0pt
−10.9%+17.1%
ILIT vs SETM Performance
−26.3%−8.3%
- ILIT 0.47%, better
- SETM 0.65%
- ILIT $10M
- SETM $418M
- ILIT −26.3%
- SETM −8.3%, better
- ILIT 3.22%, better
- SETM 1.85%
- ILIT 54
- SETM 157
- ILIT 12.1K sh
- SETM 157K sh, better
- ILIT $10.05
- SETM $24.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILIT | SETM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | D38 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D27 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | B69 | A80Higher |
| Durability | C43 | B64Higher |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. ILIT and SETM are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILITB
SETMC
In short
ILIT Most lithium funds blend miners with EV makers and battery tech. ILIT stays at the source: an index of global companies whose main business is digging lithium ore or making lithium compounds, about 40 names, for 0.47% a year.
SETM Most funds in this corner pick a lane: lithium, or rare earths. SETM tracks an index built to span the wider critical-materials complex, roughly 160 miners and processors in a single basket.
Stated mandate
ILIT ILIT aims to replicate an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equity issuers whose principal activities are lithium-ore mining or lithium-compound manufacturing.
SETM SETM seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total-return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILIT vs SETM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILIT vs SETM Cost
Overpaying SETM vs ILIT
$3,299
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILIT 0.47%
$9,418
SETM 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILIT | SETM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $1,163 | $316 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $4,440 | $1,179 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $12,717 | $3,299 |
- 0.47%ILIT, cheaper
- 0.65%SETM
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
ILIT cheapest of 12 funds
SETM 7th cheapest of 12 funds
ILIT vs SETM Dividends
- ILIT 3.22%, better
- SETM 1.85%
- ILIT $0.32
- SETM $0.45
- ILIT $0.02
- SETM $0.45
- ILIT Jun 15, 2026
- SETM Dec 18, 2025
- ILIT Jun 18, 2026
- SETM Dec 22, 2025
- ILIT Twice a year
- SETM Annual
Distribution history
ILIT vs SETM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILIT 46.6%SETM 36.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ILIT −0.11SETM 0.49, better
- Worst fall
- ILIT −73.7%SETM −42.8%
- Market sensitivity
- ILIT 1.58SETM 1.33
ILIT and SETM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

