VIG ranks 5th and FTDS 46th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
FTDS vs VIG
VIG −0.66pt a year
0.70%0.04%
VIG 467.9×the volume
2.19K1.02M
VIG +1.9pt
+11.9%+13.8%
FTDS vs VIG Performance
+48.9%+65.3%
- FTDS 0.70%
- VIG 0.04%, better
- FTDS $40M
- VIG $128B
- FTDS +26.8%, better
- VIG +16.0%
- FTDS 1.57%, better
- VIG 1.47%
- FTDS 51
- VIG 335
- FTDS 2.19K sh
- VIG 1.02M sh, better
- FTDS $67.47
- VIG $247.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTDS | VIG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A83 | A84Higher |
| Risk | C46 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | D27 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | B61Higher | C52 |
| Durability | C54 | A92Higher |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. FTDS and VIG are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTDSC
VIGA
In short
FTDS A yield fund with a bouncer at the door: companies must clear debt, return-on-equity, payout and dividend-growth tests before the index ranks them by yield. The roughly 50 survivors get equal weight, rechecked every quarter.
VIG VIG buys dividend growth, not fat yields: about 300 US companies with a record of raising their payouts, tracked for 0.04% a year. Running since 2006 and now north of $100 billion, it is the plain-vanilla anchor of the dividend-screen aisle.
Stated mandate
FTDS The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of The Dividend Strength Index before fees and expenses.
VIG The fund seeks to track the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, which represents common stocks of companies with a record of increasing dividends over time.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTDS vs VIG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTDS vs VIG Cost
Overpaying FTDS vs VIG
$12,757
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTDS 0.70%
$13,606
VIG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTDS | VIG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $73 | $1,177 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $288 | $4,472 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $849 | $12,757 |
- 0.70%FTDS
- 0.04%VIG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
VIG cheapest of 52 funds
FTDS 52nd cheapest of 52 funds
FTDS vs VIG Dividends
- FTDS 1.57%, better
- VIG 1.47%
- FTDS $1.06
- VIG $3.65
- FTDS $0.31
- VIG $0.93
- FTDS Sep 24, 2026
- VIG Sep 28, 2026
- FTDS Sep 30, 2026
- VIG Sep 30, 2026
- FTDS Quarterly
- VIG Quarterly
Distribution history
FTDS vs VIG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTDS
- VIG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTDS 14.3%VIG 10.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FTDS 1.08VIG 1.33, better
- Worst fall
- FTDS −23.4%VIG −20.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FTDS 0.59VIG 0.82
FTDS and VIG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





