QLVE ranks 7th and FTHF 19th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
FTHF vs QLVE
QLVE −0.57pt a year
0.75%0.18%
FTHF 43.9×the volume
17.7K404
FTHF +15.7pt
+33.1%+17.4%
FTHF vs QLVE Performance
+41.5%+11.2%
- FTHF 0.75%
- QLVE 0.18%, better
- FTHF $135M
- QLVE $16M
- FTHF +41.5%, better
- QLVE +11.2%
- FTHF 3.55%, better
- QLVE 3.17%
- FTHF 105
- QLVE 155
- FTHF 17.7K sh, better
- QLVE 404 sh
- FTHF $42.80
- QLVE $32.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTHF | QLVE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A85 | A93Higher |
| Risk | D34 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C43Higher | F11 |
| Holdings | D30 | D32Higher |
| Durability | C45Higher | D33 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. FTHF and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTHFD
QLVEB
In short
FTHF First Trust's emerging markets fund tracks a "human flourishing" index, layering profitability and quality screens onto roughly 100 EM stocks. No other fund in its peer group follows the same benchmark.
QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
FTHF The fund seeks to track the Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index before fees and expenses and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in securities comprising that index.
QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTHF vs QLVE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTHF vs QLVE Cost
Overpaying FTHF vs QLVE
$10,733
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTHF 0.75%
$14,482
QLVE 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTHF | QLVE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $328 | $1,008 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $1,281 | $3,797 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $3,749 | $10,733 |
- 0.75%FTHF
- 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QLVE cheapest of 20 funds
FTHF 18th cheapest of 20 funds
FTHF vs QLVE Dividends
- FTHF 3.55%, better
- QLVE 3.17%
- FTHF $1.52
- QLVE $1.02
- FTHF $0.23
- QLVE $0.34
- FTHF Sep 24, 2026
- QLVE Sep 18, 2026
- FTHF Sep 30, 2026
- QLVE Sep 24, 2026
- FTHF Quarterly
- QLVE Quarterly
Distribution history
FTHF vs QLVE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTHF 24.2%QLVE 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FTHF 1.13, betterQLVE 1.11
- Worst fall
- FTHF −21.1%QLVE −23.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FTHF 1.01QLVE 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.